Re: The page 2 (posts 16-30) stuff and the "Apostolic" part of the thread title.
Phat writes:
Critics would say I was swayed by the author of John....which is true.
Yet don't you look at John selectively and only through a modern interpretation colored by modern teachings?
Have you looked into how the author of John might have actually seen things which requires looking at those things that the author of John would have been familiar with?