Evidence of the flood

The Geologic Column was formed by the Flood, the current deposits are not continuous with the deposits of that one-time event.

You really think that gradually accumulating dust or ash could become anything like the strata of the Geologic Column?The Geologic Column was formed by the Flood, the current deposits are not continuous with the deposits of that one-time event.

HEY! SHOW ME these supposed current varve deposits that I'm supposed to think are part of the Geo Column.

Prove it. Show me a KNOWN example of a RECENTLY deposited LAYER like those in the Geo Column.

You are wrong. I did start giving up on threads but only about three years ago because the attitude here was getting to me. But even after that I posted a LOT of VERY substantivel argument. And for you to say otherwise is just another example of the attitude I'm talking about. The real question is why I post here at all given the attitude I have to put up with.

PROVE IT!

I know what the Geological Column is and it is not gradually accumulated sediments.

THEY ARE NOT PART OF THE GEOLOGIC COLUMN.

NO BASINS FORMED IN THE FLOOD, SO THERE ARE NO BASINS IN THE GEO CFOLUMN.CONTINENTS COLLIDED AFTER THE FLOOD, AS EVIDENCED BY THE UNDISTURBED STACK OF STRATA EXHIBITED IN THE GRAND CANYON AT LEAST BUT ELSEWHERE TOO, AS ALL THE DISTURBANCE CLEARLY HAPPENED AFTER THE WHOLE STACK WAS IN PLACE.THERE IS NO EROSION BETWEEN THE LAYERS OF THE GEO COLUMN THAT COULD RIGHTLY BE ATTRIBUTED TO SURFACE EROSION.VOLCANISM BEGAN WITH THE FLOOD AND SO DID EARTHQUAKES

HOW DARE YOU. APOLOGIZE AND STOP THE ACCUSATIONS.

THE GEO TIME SCALE IS BASED ON THE GEO COLUMN.

Being on top is not being continuous with.

IN THE ROCKS OF THE GEO COLUMN.

THE MICHIGAN BASIN BECAME A BASIN AFTER ALL THE STRATA WERE IN PLACE.THE EROSION BETWEEN THE LAYERS IN THE GC IS TOO TINY TO HAVE OCCURRED ON THE SURFACE, IT HAD TO HAVE OCCURRED AFTER THE STRATA WERE ALL IN PLACE.AND THE FLOOD STARTED WHEREVER THE STRATA START, DEEP BENEATH THE GC FOR INSTANCE, AND STOPS AT THE TOP OF THE GRAND STAIRCASE.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

OH BUT THEY ARE SO INTIMATELY TIED TOGETHER IT CAN BE CLEARLY SEEN THAT THERE COULD NEVER HAVE BEEN ANYTHING LIKE THE SCENARIOS SUPPOSEDLY ILLUSTRATING THE TIME PERIODS WHERE THE ROCKS ARE THAT ARE NOW IN THEIR PLACE.