|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
Faith  Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days) Posts: 35298 From: Nevada, USA Joined: |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: A Book about the Anti-Trump Conspiracy | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Two TV comedians talking about another TV comedian.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
There's almost as good money writing conspiracy books as in living off the Christian Cult of Ignorance.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined:
|
Faith, you are simply singing the motto of the Bandar-Log.
quote: Faith writes: It would also be nice if some of those on the left might recognize that there really are a lot of us who see things this way and consider that maybe there's something to it. We do recognize that there are lots who see things as you do and we have considered that there might be something to it but the overwhelming conclusion is that it is just the chatter of the Bandar-Log.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Beliefs are not evidence of anything other than the fact that someone claims to hold a particular belief.
That is NOT evidence of any conspiracy. Faith has not provided any evidence to support any position beyond the fact that the book exists.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Faith writes: The evidence is everywhere, open your eyes. If that were true you might be able to actually produce some evidence. Please present the evidence that is everywhere and not just in conspiracy nutjob books.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Faith writes: I'm not defending Trump, I refuse to have an opinion about him because of the way he's being treated. I don't care what his flaws are, the attack on him is so ridiculously out of proportion I don't want to feed it even a crumb. Yet you present no evidence to support your position while there is overwhelming evidence that Trump really is simply a boor.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Faith writes: The demand for evidence is just a way of calling your opponent a liar. No Faith, that once again is simply another of your incorrect assertions. Focusing on the book by demanding evidence for the assertions made in the book is what separates the civilized from the barbarian, the wise from the ignorant, the sane from the delusional, the truth from the fiction, reality from fantasy and the facts from the cultist dogma.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Faith writes: No, if anyone wants to discuss any of this you have to discuss it as if there is real observation and good judgment on the side of your opponents. Real observation and good judgement are supported by real evidence and good facts. Please present the evidence that supports the assertion that there is an anti-Trump Conspiracy.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
What is the evidence to support the assertions made in the second paragraph of the book? In particular, what is the evidence to support an assertion that "If the first family had a dog, they would probably call it a Russian bot."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
So you offer no evidence, just more unsupported assertions.
Specifically, what is the evidence to support the assertion that "If the first family had a dog, they would probably call it a Russian bot."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Again Faith; where is the evidence to support your assertions and the assertions made in the second paragraph of Chapter 1 of the book?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined:
|
Faith writes: Second, I want to ask if you think the incidents in which Trump family and staff have been accosted by the public or turned out at restaurants and that sort of thing have anything to do with the press and if you think that's all acceptable treatment? The family and staff being accosted by the public are the direct result of the Presidents behavior and in particular his constant public comments that are either provocative, vile, racist, or down right lies. Such accosting (is there such a word) is not just acceptable but rather the duty of all US citizens. Even the President is not above the law and certainly should not be above common decent social behavior and Trump is simply unfit to be in polite company. Asking the press secretary to leave the restaurant may well be understandable but is definitely NOT acceptable behavior and may have been illegal.
Faith writes: In general do you believe there is an unusually high level of public animosity against this President and those associated with him generated by the press and do you approve of it? No. I do not see any signs on animosity against Trump but there definitely is, as there should be, responses to his behavior and posts. That is as it should be. The President of the US should be responsible for his behavior.
Faith writes: I think the press has a basic obligation to serve the public peace but that since Trump was elected they seem determined to whip people into a frenzy of hatred against him and against the half of the country that voted for him. Agree or disagree? No, I most definitely do not agree that the " press has a basic obligation to serve the public peace" and in fact the very idea that the press has a basic obligation to serve the public peace is destructive and entirely foreign to any concept of Democracy. The press has a basic obligation to serve the public; PERIOD. If that means reporting things that disturb the general peace then that is what should be reported. Edited by jar, : fix sub-title
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
If the topic is about The Case Against the Anti-Trump Conspiracy might it not be wise to first provide the evidence there is some anti-Trump conspiracy?
Wouldn't the way to do that be by providing actual evidence of an anti-Trump conspiracy?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Taq writes: In fact, most presidents were smart enough to avoid nepotism. While most US Presidents seem to have avoided direct nepotism a significant number have not. Remember Bobby Kennedy and Sargent Shriver? According to an article in Constitution Daily on the subject: quote:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 424 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined:
|
Faith writes: No, it's those who disagree with me who need to hear the opposing point of view. Agreed, so why do you never bring anything but unsupported assertions, innuendo, misrepresentation and patently false material? To convince anyone you need to bring something with substance and worth.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024