|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,908 Year: 4,165/9,624 Month: 1,036/974 Week: 363/286 Day: 6/13 Hour: 1/2 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Is mans theory of human evolution clouded from the truth? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yaro Member (Idle past 6526 days) Posts: 1797 Joined: |
Well, I don't think thats a fair question WJ. After all we are talking about a race of creatures created for heavy labour, I don't think the aliens were trying to make the genes look 'pretty' as it were. After all do you complain about a tracktors paint job?
As the story goes, they were intended for slave labour, it was only a bi-product of interplanetary politics that saw us rise to todays levels. I kinda like the story It would make a neat comic book or something.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cthulhu Member (Idle past 5882 days) Posts: 273 From: Roe Dyelin Joined: |
Wait...
So humans were created for slave labor. The Elder Things, or Old Ones, or those big barrel/starfish aliens who made the shoggoths, or whatever the hell you want to call them used humans for slave labor. Gasp! It's true! All of it is true! Ia! Cthulhu fhtagn!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loudmouth Inactive Member |
quote: If humans are GLO-, then all the aliens have to do is look for the GLO- colony in their intergalactic petri dishes.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frances Inactive Member |
...but is your first name Fred? If so, I think I know you, and would you please email me on: francesplayer@yahoo.dk? Its Eva
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gary Inactive Member |
Annunaki: I don't see what evidence there is for this. Using Google, I found the same website you copy and pasted that timeline from, and the other information on that website does not appear to be based on fact. There is no evidence, save for a few websites perhaps, that the human genome was influenced by Annunaki to create the human race as it is now. I can't find any pictures of the Emerald Tablets of Thoth either, from which that website appears to draw material - only descriptions about how they are indestructible and really old. How do you know they exist?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
truthlover Member (Idle past 4089 days) Posts: 1548 From: Selmer, TN Joined: |
Personally, I thought the Sitchin books were some of the most interesting books I ever read. Totally cool.
Now, if the science just worked....
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Itachi Uchiha Member (Idle past 5645 days) Posts: 272 From: mayaguez, Puerto RIco Joined: |
Wow this stuff is really entertaining. Why dont you give a copy of this to George Lucas or Peter Jackson. You might have the next blockbuster hit on your hands.
Hey Yaro you the bomb Girl youre gorgeous
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amlodhi Inactive Member |
quote: I agree 100%, truthlover, it was an appealing theory. I first became interested because, if it could be supported, it would provide some tremendous answers to many of the various artifacts (not physical artifacts) found in our religious rituals. In short, we would basically be a modern day "cargo cult". Unfortunately,(much as I "wanted to believe"), the support just isn't there. I don't read cuneiform, but I can follow the arguments of those who (really) do. Sitchin has been shown to be wildly speculative (and downright wrong) more often than not. In addition, much of his speculation derives from a highly subjective interpretation of graphic reliefs, which amounts to little more than an ancient version of the Thematic Apperception Test, in which the respondent is asked to look at "still life" drawings of people in various settings and make up a story surrounding it. Too bad, really, it was fun while it lasted. Amlodhi [This message has been edited by Amlodhi, 03-14-2004]
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Spencer Inactive Member |
You keep saying 12.21.12
Is that the same date as the mayan doomsday date?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Jack Member Posts: 3514 From: Immigrant in the land of Deutsch Joined: Member Rating: 8.3 |
Damn American date format (mutter, grumble) - took me a while.
I believe the Mayan date 23rd December 2012, or two days out from that.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
neil88 Inactive Member |
I agree with Annunaki that the world will end on 12-21-12. I have bet $10,000 on this. But if I win, I'm not sure how I will collect.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Melchior Inactive Member |
Why the sudden jump from
126BC (2130 years ago) to2123BC (4127 years ago)? |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yaro Member (Idle past 6526 days) Posts: 1797 Joined: |
LOL.
That's not me, its a photoshoped Angelina Jolie. I actually thought I made her look funny with the bulgie eyes. Meh... go figure. Thanks for the sentiment anyway.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1.61803 Member (Idle past 1533 days) Posts: 2928 From: Lone Star State USA Joined: |
LOL!! I thought there was something about the eyes that was (different). You are a trickster!!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Spencer Inactive Member |
Sitchu has out-dated facts...
He believes (believed?) that there was a civilization on Mars that made this 'statue'
The Nibiru civilization also helped create the other monolithic structures present on earth created by the egyptians, mayas, etc. With our technology now...
We can see he is wrong. Also, he says the Sumerian culture had predicted all of the planets in our solar system(they strangely believed that our sun was a planet along with our moon, but only our moon not any other moon orbiting another planet...). For a while, I guess you could say he was correct, but modern technology comes along and quickly dismisses this idea as we have found another planet. CNN.com - Scientists: Most distant object in solar system found - Mar 15, 2004 [This message has been edited by Spencer, 03-16-2004]
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024