|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Exposing the evolution theory. Part 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
sensei Member Posts: 480 Joined: |
Religion is not the topic here. You still fail to grasp that? Keep insisting on changing the topic? If we start doing that, why won't you start proving abiogenisis and Big Bang?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
AZPaul3 Member Posts: 8564 From: Phoenix Joined: Member Rating: 5.1 |
Don't expect me to stoop down to your level of "brilliance" and accept your false theories. You can stoop to any level that fits you. We don't care what you care to believe. The science is as it is and your discomfort with it is of no concern to anyone. Still haven't found your god, I see.Stop Tzar Vladimir the Condemned!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
AZPaul3 Member Posts: 8564 From: Phoenix Joined: Member Rating: 5.1 |
Religion is not the topic here. Bullshit! You are here for religious reasons. You try to boost your religious zeal by thinking you can fight evolution. This entire site is about religion you retarded backwater inbreed. No self awareness at all. The dumb is strong with this one. And, god damn it, sensei, where is your fuckin god?Stop Tzar Vladimir the Condemned!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
sensei Member Posts: 480 Joined: |
When science has a theory that contradicts reality, then the theory is false. Simple as that!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
sensei Member Posts: 480 Joined: |
Troll
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Taq Member Posts: 10085 Joined: Member Rating: 5.6 |
sensei writes: If universal common ancestry were true, then it would have produced some nested hierarchy. So any nested hierarchy that we find, must be a result of common ancestry. There is no "any nested hierarchy". Either it is a nested hierarchy or it isn't. If common ancestry is true AND vertical inheritance is true, then it should produce a nested hierarchy. That's the prediction. The observation is a nested hierarchy. Prediction supported. Theory supported. When observations match the predictions made by the theory then the theory is supported. That's how science works.
Because if it came from design, it could have been designed in different ways. ​ Exactly. There is no reason why design would produce a nested hierarchy over any other pattern. Only common ancestry with vertical inheritance will necessarily produce a nested hierarchy. When A predicts billions of possible patterns and B predicts one specific pattern, observation of the specific pattern predicted by B makes B the better explanation.
No wonder you think the nested hierarchy is so great, while it really isn't. Your reasoning is totally flawed. Funny how you can't explain why my reasoning is flawed.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Taq Member Posts: 10085 Joined: Member Rating: 5.6 |
sensei writes: When science has a theory that contradicts reality, Common ancestry predicts a nested hierarchy. We observe a nested hierarchy. The theory matches reality.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Taq Member Posts: 10085 Joined: Member Rating: 5.6 |
sensei writes: Arguing that a god could have done something differently is in no way evidence that a god could not have done it the way it is. It's called the law of parsimony.
quote:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
AZPaul3 Member Posts: 8564 From: Phoenix Joined: Member Rating: 5.1 |
Science defines reality. Science is the best way to determine reality.
Your science hatred is no surprise. Science destroys your god. Evolution destroys your god. And you are right. When a speculation violates physics, your god loses and disappears in a puff of reality.Stop Tzar Vladimir the Condemned!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Taq Member Posts: 10085 Joined: Member Rating: 5.6 |
sensei writes: Bats can fly perfectly fine. So what is your problem? Ligher bones solves a problem that does not exist. Please explain why a designer could not have given bats lighter bones, or birds heavier bones. Please explain why a designer would be forced to fit his designs into a nested hierarchy.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
sensei Member Posts: 480 Joined: |
I don't hate science. If anybody hates science, it's you, as you kee abusing it with flawed logic, false theories and wrong assumpsions.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
AZPaul3 Member Posts: 8564 From: Phoenix Joined: Member Rating: 5.1 |
Intellectually incompetent religionist dumbass.
... still without evidence of your god.Stop Tzar Vladimir the Condemned!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Taq Member Posts: 10085 Joined: Member Rating: 5.6 |
sensei writes: You seem to think that close similarity can only mean common ancestry. False. I think that a nested hierarchy evidences common ancestry. Hasn't that sunk in yet? If a species had similarities that were derived features from both mammals and birds this would FALSIFY evolution. This would disprove evolution. Similarities can disprove evolution if certain similarities are seen together in the same species. So NO, I am not saying that similarities in and of themselves evidence common ancestry. I am saying that the PATTERN of similarities evidences common ancestry.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
sensei Member Posts: 480 Joined: |
You explain why evolution has not resulted in multiple human species today. And explain why evolution has not resulted 18 legged spiders.
What purpose do you see in explaining why something that is not, is not? I already pointed this out, but you keep insisting. Yet another evolutionist who keeps insisting in bad logic and flawed arguments.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Taq Member Posts: 10085 Joined: Member Rating: 5.6 |
sensei writes: I don't hate science. Then why are you rejecting the scientific method? In the scientific method, a theory makes a prediction. If that prediction is observed then the theory is supported. You are actively rejecting this logic.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024