Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,911 Year: 4,168/9,624 Month: 1,039/974 Week: 366/286 Day: 9/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Some help for the TC model
Joe Meert
Member (Idle past 5710 days)
Posts: 913
From: Gainesville
Joined: 03-02-2002


Message 53 of 84 (9165)
05-02-2002 10:40 AM
Reply to: Message 52 by Joe Meert
04-24-2002 9:54 PM


Making sure this doesn't escape.
Cheers
Joe Meert

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by Joe Meert, posted 04-24-2002 9:54 PM Joe Meert has not replied

  
Joe Meert
Member (Idle past 5710 days)
Posts: 913
From: Gainesville
Joined: 03-02-2002


Message 55 of 84 (9170)
05-02-2002 11:34 AM
Reply to: Message 54 by joz
05-02-2002 11:18 AM


I just received my GSA Today and the feature article is a rebuttal of the Ryan-Pitman Black Sea 'flood' as an analogue for the Noachian myth. I cannot reproduce the entire article, but I think it has free online access at:
http://www.geosociety.org/pubs/gsatoday/
Cheers
Joe Meert

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by joz, posted 05-02-2002 11:18 AM joz has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 56 by Joe Meert, posted 05-05-2002 11:37 AM Joe Meert has not replied

  
Joe Meert
Member (Idle past 5710 days)
Posts: 913
From: Gainesville
Joined: 03-02-2002


Message 56 of 84 (9240)
05-05-2002 11:37 AM
Reply to: Message 55 by Joe Meert
05-02-2002 11:34 AM


tc, let me know where you are at in your homework.
cheers
joe meert

This message is a reply to:
 Message 55 by Joe Meert, posted 05-02-2002 11:34 AM Joe Meert has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 57 by TrueCreation, posted 05-06-2002 10:22 PM Joe Meert has replied

  
Joe Meert
Member (Idle past 5710 days)
Posts: 913
From: Gainesville
Joined: 03-02-2002


Message 58 of 84 (9296)
05-07-2002 12:41 AM
Reply to: Message 57 by TrueCreation
05-06-2002 10:22 PM


quote:
Originally posted by TrueCreation:
--Well lets see, Joz said that I should use SI units, unfortunately it was only a bit helpful in temperature. However I am still concerned with age and age of subducted crust, should it simply be years? or millions of years (written as 6,000,000 or 6?) I haven't been able to apply physics to these types of geophysical equations so I am not all too sharp here, apparently there are no educators at the school that I attend that are qualified or understand the geophysics. And velocity, I don't think that you would use m/s. As well as the logic used to define the variables for Mantle temp and density. I would guess that it would be taken at measurements of reasonable ocean lithospheric crust depths, maybe 3300 kg/m3, a variable I have seen at times in lithospheric dynamics for mantle density (is it an average?). The answers to these questions are of course above me right now, and I would like to get it.
--Maybe there is a text-book reference explaining the lithospheric dynamics you know which could help me in this topic, as well as other equations for figuring the effects or causes of tectonic plate actions. Doesn't have to be expensive, just reliable information.
--I also need to develope calculations on how the oceans above spreading boundaries would be reacting to this to obtain a variable for the amount of heat produced. Then I can make a model which was attempted in gene and my discussion here:

JM: Yes, well keep working and I'll keep bringing this point up. You see, the point I am trying to make is that you didn't think your argument all the way through since a relatively simple calculation results in oceans that are a bit too shallow for a catastrophic flood model. As I mentioned, you have the references and the calculations completed for you on my web page, so it doesn't take a whole lot of work on your part. You just have to justify the model you use and then plug in the numbers.
Cheers
Joe Meert

This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by TrueCreation, posted 05-06-2002 10:22 PM TrueCreation has not replied

  
Joe Meert
Member (Idle past 5710 days)
Posts: 913
From: Gainesville
Joined: 03-02-2002


Message 61 of 84 (9336)
05-07-2002 6:50 PM
Reply to: Message 60 by TrueCreation
05-07-2002 6:45 PM


You must be consistent with your units, that's all. You can use SI, but you don't have to (though the conversions get hairy). As long as everything is scaled properly and the answer is in the correct units, you'll be ok.
Cheers
Joe Meert

This message is a reply to:
 Message 60 by TrueCreation, posted 05-07-2002 6:45 PM TrueCreation has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 62 by Joe Meert, posted 05-09-2002 9:10 AM Joe Meert has not replied

  
Joe Meert
Member (Idle past 5710 days)
Posts: 913
From: Gainesville
Joined: 03-02-2002


Message 62 of 84 (9421)
05-09-2002 9:10 AM
Reply to: Message 61 by Joe Meert
05-07-2002 6:50 PM


C'mon TC. Let's work on a thorough discussion of your model?
Cheers
Joe Meert

This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by Joe Meert, posted 05-07-2002 6:50 PM Joe Meert has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 63 by joz, posted 05-10-2002 12:00 PM Joe Meert has not replied

  
Joe Meert
Member (Idle past 5710 days)
Posts: 913
From: Gainesville
Joined: 03-02-2002


Message 65 of 84 (9528)
05-11-2002 7:32 PM
Reply to: Message 64 by TrueCreation
05-11-2002 7:21 PM


quote:
Originally posted by TrueCreation:
Pm - Mantle Density - w - Density of water (assuming 4oC or pressure overcomes the variation due to temperature) = 1000 kg/m^3
Av - Coefficient of thermal expansion
Tm - Mantle Temperature (as if it were a plume, mantle upwelling) = 1573.15K - 1773.15K
T0 - Surface Temperature = 373.15K
K - Thermal diffusivity = 1 mm^2 s^(-1)
X - Distance from center = 3000(?) meters
V - Estimated Velocity = 1.5 m (linear)/year, 4.109589 mm/day, 0.1712328 mm/hour, 0.0028538812 mm/min, .0000475646879 mm/sec (.0000000475646879 m/sec)
--Thought I would have you check before I put myself through more trouble
JM: TC, You can find what I used for my model on the link provided. I don't want you to duplicate my work, I want you to defend your own model. Seems to me that 1.5 m/year opening for the Atlantic won't quite do it on a 6000 year old earth. In fact, if you attribute the rapid drift to the flood, you not only end up with a shallow ocean, you end up with an extremely small ocean as well using your velocity.
Cheers
Joe Meert

This message is a reply to:
 Message 64 by TrueCreation, posted 05-11-2002 7:21 PM TrueCreation has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 66 by Joe Meert, posted 05-11-2002 7:33 PM Joe Meert has not replied
 Message 67 by TrueCreation, posted 05-11-2002 7:42 PM Joe Meert has not replied

  
Joe Meert
Member (Idle past 5710 days)
Posts: 913
From: Gainesville
Joined: 03-02-2002


Message 66 of 84 (9529)
05-11-2002 7:33 PM
Reply to: Message 65 by Joe Meert
05-11-2002 7:32 PM


the new link
http://gondwanaresearch.com/oceans.htm
Cheers
Joe Meert

This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by Joe Meert, posted 05-11-2002 7:32 PM Joe Meert has not replied

  
Joe Meert
Member (Idle past 5710 days)
Posts: 913
From: Gainesville
Joined: 03-02-2002


Message 69 of 84 (9532)
05-11-2002 8:28 PM
Reply to: Message 68 by TrueCreation
05-11-2002 7:46 PM


Yes, I do. Geodynamics by Turcotte and Schubert is what I teach from. So far all you are doing is duplicating my work which already shows the problem you will face. What you need is a new model in order to get a deep ocean quickly.
Cheers
Joe Meert

This message is a reply to:
 Message 68 by TrueCreation, posted 05-11-2002 7:46 PM TrueCreation has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 70 by TrueCreation, posted 05-11-2002 11:38 PM Joe Meert has replied

  
Joe Meert
Member (Idle past 5710 days)
Posts: 913
From: Gainesville
Joined: 03-02-2002


Message 71 of 84 (9547)
05-12-2002 5:15 PM
Reply to: Message 70 by TrueCreation
05-11-2002 11:38 PM


quote:
Originally posted by TrueCreation:
"Yes, I do. Geodynamics by Turcotte and Schubert is what I teach from. So far all you are doing is duplicating my work which already shows the problem you will face. What you need is a new model in order to get a deep ocean quickly."
--Thanks for the reference, it looks nice and half.com has a good price for it (within my range) so I might be able to get ahold of it. Also, was this ocean depth we are looking at or basalt thickness or something along that line, I'm skimming through your article but can't seem to find this pinpoint.

JM: Well, the title of the page is a good hint!
Cheers
Joe Meert

This message is a reply to:
 Message 70 by TrueCreation, posted 05-11-2002 11:38 PM TrueCreation has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 72 by TrueCreation, posted 05-12-2002 7:42 PM Joe Meert has replied

  
Joe Meert
Member (Idle past 5710 days)
Posts: 913
From: Gainesville
Joined: 03-02-2002


Message 73 of 84 (9554)
05-12-2002 10:20 PM
Reply to: Message 72 by TrueCreation
05-12-2002 7:42 PM


quote:
--BTW did baumgardner do any profiling on sea-floor topography such as you have, and if so what is wrong with his calculations, or did he not address it?
JM: As far as I know, he did not deal with it. He was more worried about subduction and simply said the Atlantic ocean opened as a result of subduction elsewhere. It's one of many problems with Baugardner's model. It's also what happens when your religion leads you astray!
Cheers
Joe Meert

This message is a reply to:
 Message 72 by TrueCreation, posted 05-12-2002 7:42 PM TrueCreation has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 74 by TrueCreation, posted 05-14-2002 12:41 AM Joe Meert has replied

  
Joe Meert
Member (Idle past 5710 days)
Posts: 913
From: Gainesville
Joined: 03-02-2002


Message 75 of 84 (9621)
05-14-2002 1:36 AM
Reply to: Message 74 by TrueCreation
05-14-2002 12:41 AM


quote:
--I don't think he addresses sea-floor topography on a large or appropriate scale though.
JM: He doesn't address the relevant question at all.
Cheers
Joe Meert

This message is a reply to:
 Message 74 by TrueCreation, posted 05-14-2002 12:41 AM TrueCreation has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 76 by Joe Meert, posted 05-15-2002 8:20 PM Joe Meert has not replied

  
Joe Meert
Member (Idle past 5710 days)
Posts: 913
From: Gainesville
Joined: 03-02-2002


Message 76 of 84 (9699)
05-15-2002 8:20 PM
Reply to: Message 75 by Joe Meert
05-14-2002 1:36 AM


So TC here is something that is best explained in a uniformitarian sense and does not fit the flood model.
Cheers
Joe Meert

This message is a reply to:
 Message 75 by Joe Meert, posted 05-14-2002 1:36 AM Joe Meert has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 77 by TrueCreation, posted 05-15-2002 10:26 PM Joe Meert has replied

  
Joe Meert
Member (Idle past 5710 days)
Posts: 913
From: Gainesville
Joined: 03-02-2002


Message 78 of 84 (9947)
05-18-2002 9:58 PM
Reply to: Message 77 by TrueCreation
05-15-2002 10:26 PM


Since you've gone on a posting rampage to other topics, I wanted to make sure this one did not drift too far off the page.
Cheers
Joe Meert

This message is a reply to:
 Message 77 by TrueCreation, posted 05-15-2002 10:26 PM TrueCreation has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 79 by TrueCreation, posted 05-18-2002 10:26 PM Joe Meert has replied

  
Joe Meert
Member (Idle past 5710 days)
Posts: 913
From: Gainesville
Joined: 03-02-2002


Message 80 of 84 (10221)
05-22-2002 7:51 PM
Reply to: Message 79 by TrueCreation
05-18-2002 10:26 PM


quote:
Originally posted by TrueCreation:
"Since you've gone on a posting rampage to other topics, I wanted to make sure this one did not drift too far off the page."
--This thread isn't going anywhere, I had ordered the text on Geodynamics a couple days ago, its arival date is somewhere in the vicinity of the 28 of this month, though the given estimated dates of dilivery go all the way toward mid June. Books I had ordered from Half.com people have usually came quite quick though. So it should be here soon.

Since everyone seems to be in the bumping mood, why not?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 79 by TrueCreation, posted 05-18-2002 10:26 PM TrueCreation has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 81 by TrueCreation, posted 05-30-2002 2:45 PM Joe Meert has not replied
 Message 82 by TrueCreation, posted 06-10-2002 3:53 PM Joe Meert has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024