The wheel (Irreduceable complexity weakness)

As a a kid, when I first heard about Darwin and the "theory" of evolution, I immediately realized why no animals moved around on wheels. Simply because there are no stages between a limb and a rotating wheel (runnning inside a ball bearing). In my opinion, the wheel is one of the first inventions of a genuin intelligent designer, like ourselfes. Why aint the wheel used more as an argument for why, the so called intelligent designer, is actually stupid? I think the wheel is worthy a debate on ID and irreduceable complexity, and lack of intelligence. Any REAL intelligent designer would invent the wheel very early.I am amazed that nobody has used this arguement allready!Edited by Hauk, : Bad spelling.... Exotic native language... Poor english... Mistakes correctedEdited by Hauk, : Spellings errors... Drunk norwegian, typing like crasy, had to do corrections

---

The fool on the hill

Welcome to evcforum.I'm putting this on hold for the moment, while your other thread is discussed. Two threads at the same time can be heavy going, particularly for a new member.Other admins are welcome to disagree with my decision

---

When I think of it, this topic is crap. I see no sence in making a thread like this