salty, who left evcforum never to return, writes:
Here is one for the books. Over 200 posts dealing with a moron, coping with bilge, nonsense and mindless speculation? That must be some kind of record! I would think you might have better things to do.
Naw, that's nothing. You should check out some of the Peter Borger threads. You're barely in the same league.
and continuing to burble on about nothing, writes:
It is nothing more than a perfect demonstration of the lengths to which those adherents of the purposeless, random, goaless and Godless must go in order to protect the most pathetic hypothesis in the history of science.
Well, certainly the purposeless...Godless bit refers to evolution, but the latter part about "the most pathetic hypothesis in the history of science" is more along the lines of what we spent 200+ posts trying to get you to explain.
and as a final gratuitous insult to those who actually know what they're talking about, salty writes:
I'm writing a paper even more ridiculous than the last. You can whistle for this one. salty
Are you actually going to publish this one in a journal? Even
Revista won't publish you any more - and that's saying alot. Or are you praying for acceptance by ISCID? Engle's endorsement isn't something I'd want on my resume if I ever expected to get a real science job. Maybe Discovery Institute will hire you?
As an additional parting shot - the best discussion of your hypothesis is taking place in a thread in which you aren't even participating
here. Have fun whining to Terry.
™ Version 4.2