Schrafinator and others fire mike

I don't understand this. Irishrockhound also said this to me. I would like to know why people get so annoyed and feel this way with a creationist if none-belief is a dispassionate lack of belief in God. Surely people get offended if I don't believe in evolution.Shraff, please explain more about why you think this way about me all of a sudden.Are you firing mike like you fire God when he doesn't perform your will?

Give an example.Your premise is that I'm asking questions, so I can have an answer and then convert. Mine is that I am adressing problems which haven't been adequately explained or refuted, IMHO. If you think there are answers, fair enough. However, I have made no logical errors, and nobody has corrected me, even if they think they have. I invite anyone to try, they haven't. All they say is "along with corrections of your factual and logical errors". Show me some. How have I done this? I believe homo floresiensis exists just like you do, and oxygen. I just don't believe in the theories, which used to be no big deal back in the day. Popular scientific theories usually prove all wrong anyway. Remember Einstein? Light bending by gravity etc. What a crank, or ahem, what a genius. I was only suspended once when I chose to be.My behaviour is the same as ever. You seem to be so very upset with me, and even hate me with a great intolerance. I take in everything, I'm just not obliged to believe everything if I have a better answer.

Sylas, I apreciate your post, atleast you can say; "You remain a useful member of the board and a colleague I'd be glad to buy a drink if our paths were to cross."You have to realise that a lot of intelligent intellects like your good self, don't get humour for some reason. Dan Carroll, I think, gets it.Do you really think I am self-important or do you think I'm laughing my tits off? Read, "mike's ego trip" for laughs. Like Dan, I put humour first a lot of the time. Afterall, it's fun to laugh and everybody here is so darn serious.If you don't think it's comedy then there's no hope for you. Saying "irrefutable" is for laughs, because it gets such a rise out of people and I think "blimey, that really wound them up and it's so obviously a jest, how perculiar".This message has been edited by mike the wiz, 06-15-2005 10:17 AM

You see Sylas, when it comes down to it, you guys are a lot of talk.You know very well that my implication, that I shown in my previous post, is unrefuted. What you don't realize, is that there is no substance in saying "getting your head handed to you".Listen, if a majority thinks I've been refuted, that the consensus is so, that itself doesn't refute anything I have to say.If you "think I am outclassed" that's all well and dandy but it doesn't mean I am.Post 22 refutes Natural selection. NS is not an abitrary selector, it is defined as necessity based. A fast runner will not die, a slower one will. If an ape would benefit from a big brain then only by necessity it will only get one according to NS. Either it needs one therefore it will die, or it doesn't need to evolve.Continue to say I am outclassed. Like Spock before me, I have no ego to bruise.The truth is Sylas, you and others don't like what I say, and appear to have no sufficient answer to it. Now how is it possible a fool of God is wiser than men?This message has been edited by mike the wiz, 06-15-2005 12:21 PM

ADDENDUM OF IRREFUTABLE TRUTH.No Phatboy, you've chosen your side by accusing me of ranting. Like everyone else, you couldn't possibly agree with the one pissing against the wind. Why not learn what I am saying instead? No offense Phatboy, I'm not taking sides or anything. If people are irritated, that's their problem, as I am here to debate, not irritate.If people get angry - they shouldn't be getting emotionally involved. Oh sure, no limits to stupidity Percy, that's dandy, now kindly refute the logic in message 6 please. If only people could back up their insults with some action.Like others, the powers of admin I hope are not turning you over to self-righteousness Phatboy. You don't actually think being an admin changes anything do you? Where's that guy who used to debate for the cause rather than rolling over for 'em?Phatboy, you are on their side, if you didn't know that by now it's about time you did. You have chosen the worldites, and I have not. Unlike me and Buz, you have turned into Jar number 2, and I don't know why people are so sucked in by honour of men. So I am sad to see you are with them on this. The bible says to seek honour of God, and that's what I've done. You have chosen honor from evos and admins. Now you're punching mike and saying "oh mike, I'm not punching you, I don't take sides".Sylas had an emotional outburst in messages 6. Message 7 wasn't a rant/. Like others before me used to say, an add hominem attack isn't a refutation.Saying, "haha, we're so darn great, and everyone agrees you're refuted" logically doesn't mean squat. And everybody doesn't even get what I mean by that basic logic, LOL. basics!!!The nazis backed Hitler, but that didn't make their majority right. Therefore it is TOTALLY logically IRRELEVANT if people call me stupid, and say I've "had my head handed to me" in debate. it proves nothing.An actual refuation would refute me.This message has been edited by mike the wiz, 06-15-2005 03:02 PM