|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,901 Year: 4,158/9,624 Month: 1,029/974 Week: 356/286 Day: 12/65 Hour: 0/1 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Smart People? | |||||||||||||||||||||||
lyx2no Member (Idle past 4745 days) Posts: 1277 From: A vast, undifferentiated plane. Joined: |
Who is Noone, and why is he a monster?
Kindly There is a spider by the water pipe.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Taz Member (Idle past 3320 days) Posts: 5069 From: Zerus Joined: |
lyx2no writes:
Access denied Who is Noone, and why is he a monster? I have personal sources that say Peter Noone is a satan worshipper and baby eater. But anyway, point taken. I'm trying to see things your way, but I can't put my head that far up my ass.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
lyx2no Member (Idle past 4745 days) Posts: 1277 From: A vast, undifferentiated plane. Joined: |
Just to make sure you did get my point: I'm completely on your side. I think everyone should use their time writing to practicing writing. Use the right words spelled correctly in the proper order. That you happened to be the one who left the space out of "no one" is unfortunate. It would have better illustrated the possibility of misinterpretation of ambiguous English had pelican committed the error. As it is, it will be interpreted as "nobody is perfect." No one is perfect, but does that somehow excuse the need to try?
More in line with the OT: I am dyslexic. I do not have the advantage of the first and last letters being in the right place, nor even words being in the right order. Yet, I can read. It wasn't easy and a little practice goes a long way. Let me offer a few (very few) pieces of expertise:
pelican, unless you believe yourself to be endlessly fascinating, pay extra attention to #5. Edited by lyx2no, : Contained an ambiguous construction. Kindly There is a spider by the water pipe.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
pelican Member (Idle past 5014 days) Posts: 781 From: australia Joined: |
No one is perfect, but does that somehow excuse the need to try? That wasn't the point of the OP.
pelican, unless you believe yourself to be endlessly fascinating, pay extra attention to #5. What the ??????????????????
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Larni Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: |
Pelican writes: Many posters on this forum have been 'corrected' and 'judged' and 'ignored' because of incorrect spelling. My bold. Who has been ignored?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
pelican Member (Idle past 5014 days) Posts: 781 From: australia Joined: |
I suppose it's more of a 'what' that is ignored. Full posts but mainly the whole point of the posts.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
lyx2no Member (Idle past 4745 days) Posts: 1277 From: A vast, undifferentiated plane. Joined: |
pelican writes: I truly don't think correct spelling is of great concern when it can clearly be understood, maybe with a little patience and effort. You don't make your reader do the work you should be doing. Unless you think the reader cares more about what you have to say than you do. According to the OP: . what is the big problem? was the whole point. Edited by lyx2no, : Spelling Kindly There is a spider by the water pipe.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
pelican Member (Idle past 5014 days) Posts: 781 From: australia Joined: |
OP : However, if the word is recognizable and in context, what is the big problem? What is the big problem when the word is recognizable and in context?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
lyx2no Member (Idle past 4745 days) Posts: 1277 From: A vast, undifferentiated plane. Joined: |
What is the big problem when the word is recognizable and in context? The word is always recognizable and in context to the writer. That is why the writer should not be the judge of such things. And then I guess it isn't that important if all one has to say is "See Dick run." or "Sally has a ball."; though, it is hard to make that endlessly fascinating. But if one has a complex idea to get across one can't be certain how the audience is going to interpret ambiguities. Kindly There is a spider by the water pipe.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Larni Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: |
pelican writes: I suppose it's more of a 'what' that is ignored. Full posts but mainly the whole point of the posts. Or not understood and subsequently ignored because of crappy spelling and grammer.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
pelican Member (Idle past 5014 days) Posts: 781 From: australia Joined: |
Or not understood and subsequently ignored because of crappy spelling and grammer.
Larni, I don't get your point because you've spelled Grammer wrong.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Larni Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: |
Ouch and touche.
As I have made a mistake in spelling I now throw my lot in with you: is is acceptable to be careless with spelling and grammar. Back to reality.
pelican writes: However, if the word is recognizable and in context, what is the big problem? Repeated spelling and grammar mistakes correlate in our heads with a lack of credibility. This is the same effect as Hill Billy correlating in his head long words with arrogance. If you want a technical reason look up the fundemental attribution error. It ain't fair or right but that's how our brains are wired to work: some say by a god. Go figure what he was thinking. Edited by Larni, : Inevitable spelling mistakes.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
pelican Member (Idle past 5014 days) Posts: 781 From: australia Joined: |
I didn't mean to get you. I meant that because I focussed on your honest mistake, I ignored the point you were making. What was it again?
Repeated spelling and grammar mistakes correlate in our heads with a lack of credibility. Ahh good judgement! I will go by your rules and judge your post as not credible because bloody hell, Larni, you've spelled fundamental wrong. Gee I'm exasperated.
If you want a technical reason look up the fundemental attribution error. That is very naughty. By the way the definition of 'fundy attributes' sounds like a mental disorder.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Larni Member Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: |
Aargh!
Hoist by my own petard! I guess I'm not the poster boy for this arguement, eh? The fundamental attribution error has nothing to do with fundamentalism: it is social psychology.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
pelican Member (Idle past 5014 days) Posts: 781 From: australia Joined: |
The fundamental attribution error has nothing to do with fundamentalism: it is social psychology.
Yeh I know. I looked it up to check my spelling. ha ha I think it is a perfect social psychological condition that supports my OP. Ta mate!
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024