Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,906 Year: 4,163/9,624 Month: 1,034/974 Week: 361/286 Day: 4/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Hitler in the 21st century
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 113 of 136 (477802)
08-07-2008 10:11 PM
Reply to: Message 109 by Legend
08-07-2008 5:56 PM


Re: what we're fighting for
this law is the very definition of a thought crime!
Well, no, not technically, since a thought crime would constitute a crime based on one's thoughts preemptively before the action. Since no one has the ability to read minds in any way, it therefore can't be a thought crime.
People are not being criminalised for what they do (after all it's legal for conscenting adults to engage in S&M), they're being criminalised for what they're thinking about doing, which according to the law-makers is to inflict pain and torture on the unsuspecting public.
No, not really, not based upon the description. I would agree that they should be allowed to wear latex and flog each other to Yanni's greatest hits, for all they want. But it really isn't a thought crime, since the only way the authorities knew about such things was actual evidence and not their thoughts.

“Tu ne cede malis sed contra audentior ito"

This message is a reply to:
 Message 109 by Legend, posted 08-07-2008 5:56 PM Legend has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 115 by Legend, posted 08-08-2008 11:29 AM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024