General discussion of moderation procedures: The Sequel

I'd say that sounds like a pretty poor reason to eject someone form a forum. People shouldn't have to moderate their discussion based on what might "offend" someone. The logic of their argument should be left to stand on its own.Of course, it would be perfectly reasonable to insist that, should somone claim that Jesus was gay or a bigot, that they provide supporting evidence for such an assertion. If they cannot provide a rational argument, then it is simply Christian bashing, and should carry consequences. This, I think, is more in touch with the forum rules.

Deleted by Rahvin - not a debate thread.This message has been edited by Rahvin, 07-25-2005 03:00 PM

Don't mean to be a complainer, but I would really like to see an admin take a look at this thread: Are there any substitutes for inner peace? by wmscott. Throughout the long thread, wmscott has continually refused to address evidence and has instead repeated religious rhetoric and Jehovah's Witness dogma as evidence.A couple of debaters dropped out of the thread a while back becuase of his attitude and tactics, and I'm feeling the same now as well.

---

Every time a fundy breaks the laws of thermodynamics, Schroedinger probably kills his cat.