But I bet you spend far more time railing against the God of the Bible than you do visiting forums and trying to debunk Father Christmas, Thor, Zues, Neptune, Aphrodite or Fairies at the bottom of the garden.
So this disproportionate vehement treatment of the Bible's God causes me to suspect that the prospect of His reality is of far greater concern to you.
Or maybe the fact that people believe YHWH's existence and live their lives and adopt social policies based on the writings of the bronze aged people and beyond who worshipped him. As opposed to the others who don't pose as much of a social concern.
Or, yeah, maybe its because he's worried that YHWH is really real. Believe whichever you like - I'm sure your biases will err you towards the latter.
But if there was a large group of people that said we shouldn't mass produce insulin because it went against Thor's will or that glasses were an abomination and should be banned because Wotan's one-eyed nature proves it. Then you would definitely see a lot more activity in debunking Thor and Wotan.
You seem to be of the opinion that whenever god isn't omni-present or omniscient this is god seeding clues about his future incarnation as man. Do you have any evidence that this was gods plan all along or is it just apologetics designed to patch up unusual or confusing character inconsistencies in a book?