|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
Member (Idle past 1181 days) Posts: 583 From: Roraima Peak Joined: |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Return to Immortality -- There is no death by natural causes | |||||||||||||||||||||||
goldenlightArchangel Member (Idle past 1181 days) Posts: 583 From: Roraima Peak Joined: |
-
Vacate writes: ..some bizarre definition.. making absurd claims about math and evolution.
- To state that the size of the Human brain is a product of natural selectionimplies that the Human beings would have been multiplying for a time much longer than 98,000 years. However, If the Humans had been multiplying and filling the earth for over 98,000 yearsor 7 seasons of 14,000 years prior to Genesis chronology, What are the probabilities that the population would have reached 6 billion personsduring each of the seasons of 14,000 years that precede the recent 7,000 years? -
not going to answer my questions... - One does not always have internet access, specifically in wild places of Roraima, Amazon Forest.Yesterday there was no electric light at all in the north side villages. -
Appropriate fruits (give one example perhaps?) - The first is the fruit from the Tree of life: approximately 125 proteins found The Tree of life, Morinda Citrifolia, is the only solid tree that accomplishes with these two facts highlighted in the book of Revelations as originally written,
- Gives her fruit every month; 12 times a year;- Her leaves are proper for the general health of the nations. Sample of fruits from the appropriate solid trees,
1st. Noni-fruit (Morinda Citrifolia) 2nd. avocado, 3rd. jabuticaba, 4th. persimmon, 5th. equatorial mango, 6th. orange, 7th. fig, 8th. peach, 9th. tropical tangerine, 10th. pomegranate, 11th. tamarindo, 12th. jackfruit, 13th. acerola, 14th. plum. -
quote: - Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Huntard Member (Idle past 2324 days) Posts: 2870 From: Limburg, The Netherlands Joined: |
CrazyDiamond7 writes:
That's nice, cause they were.
To state that the size of the Human brain is a product of natural selectionimplies that the Human beings would have been multiplying for a time much longer than 98,000 years. However, If it is true that the Human beings had been multiplying and filling the earth for over 98,000 years
0, since they didn't. Also, again, population growth is dependant on the resources available, before the advent of modern agriculture, resources would never have been enough to support such a population. Heck, we have trouble feeding everybody right now.
or 7 seasons of 14,000 years prior to Genesis chronology, What are the probabilities that the population would have reached 6 billion personsduring each of the seasons of 14,000 years that precede the recent 7,000 years? 100 % of probability.
No actually, it's 0 I'll leave the rest to someone else.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Vacate Member (Idle past 4629 days) Posts: 565 Joined: |
A baby does not make the choice and therefore the babies are not responsible or authors of their own death. You said that humans make the choice to die by eating incorrect foods. There are many humans that die having not eaten correct or incorrect foods. Now you are saying that very young humans fall under a different rule set. Who made the choice for an infant to die a natural death? You say that there is no such thing as a natural death but then someone must be responsible for the death of a baby. At what point do humans gain the ability to not die a natural death by eating correct foods? When do the rules change and how did you find out about this change? If there is an experiment, can you provide the links?
evolution theory does bizarrely place the Human beings living 50,000 years prior Ponder for a while on bacteria; I am sure you can answer your own questions about evolution, old Earth, and human populations. I quess others can take up your challenge. I don't plan to go down this road as it seems to be so far off topic it needs its own thread.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
goldenlightArchangel Member (Idle past 1181 days) Posts: 583 From: Roraima Peak Joined: |
Who made the choice for an infant to die a natural death? - the thread title might be changed to 'There is no death by old age'? The term 'death by natural causes' had been chosen for the thread because 'Old age' is not a scientifically recognized cause of death. So the meaning: there is no death by 'old age' because one decelerates the aging process by eating only the appropriate fruits from the solid trees. -
At what point do humans gain the ability to not die a natural death by eating correct foods? Immortality is just stopping from dying by stopping from eating incompatible food. - Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
hotjer Member (Idle past 4573 days) Posts: 113 From: Denmark Joined: |
There is still a vital problem
The math does not make sense. /thread
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Huntard Member (Idle past 2324 days) Posts: 2870 From: Limburg, The Netherlands Joined: |
CrazyDiamond7 writes:
Ok, nice. You try that, and report back in 150 years, that should prove your ideas.
Experiment: Eat only the compatible fruits from the solid treesEstimate time for reduction of intragastric acidity: 3 and a half weeks. Approximate time to complete the purpose of the nervous system: 49 days
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
goldenlightArchangel Member (Idle past 1181 days) Posts: 583 From: Roraima Peak Joined: |
-
You try that, and report.. - The info is given not to tell you to try anything,but to let you know that there is an experiment available Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Huntard Member (Idle past 2324 days) Posts: 2870 From: Limburg, The Netherlands Joined: |
CrazyDiamond7 writes:
Yes, and in order to prove that silly idea, I proposed a method to you. You go live like that, and report back here in 150 years. I guarantee you you will be believed.
The info is given not to tell you to try anything,but to let you know that there is an experiment available; an option rather than dying by natural causes or death by Old age. In regards to the Human body, it is not proper for man to be told what to do by the man,
Great. Evolution doesn't say anything about what a man should do with this body. Go evolution!
much less by a doctrine or evolution theory which is worth less than a man. If you search some men that speak in the name of the evolution theory you find many
I'm sorry what? Are you saying evolution theory isn't alive? What next? Gravity is evil because it doesn't live!?
and they speak in the name of a dead-living thing which is worth less than a man, - it is not a Human being
Absolutely correct. Neither is a duck. Or a horse. Or gravity. Or an atom. What's your point exactly?
- It is not the Intelligent Designer that made the Human body
And true again. Wow, this is probably the most right you've been so far. But again, what is your point?
And if a doctrine or theory speaks not in the name of a specific Human being
Quite right! Down with Christianity I say! Oh wait, that's not what you meant, is it?
then a beast is the type of living being that best illustrates the doctrinal image of a theory that is worth less than a Human being. And when speaking in the name of that doctrinal image or theory,
Right on brother! Destroy religion... Wait I did something wrong again, didn't I?
many have the bizarre habit of not speaking in the name of themselves so that they might seem to be speaking in the name of something immortal. Final conclusion -- Would you speak in the name of something allegedly immortal but that you know for sure is worth less than a Human being?
Nope. That's why I don't speak for god.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
goldenlightArchangel Member (Idle past 1181 days) Posts: 583 From: Roraima Peak Joined: |
-
I don't speak for god - God or elohim does not speak. According to the book of IsaIah, a god [or elohim--god(s)] is less than nothing - Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
goldenlightArchangel Member (Idle past 1181 days) Posts: 583 From: Roraima Peak Joined: |
-
Perfection between Purpose and Design is to be demonstrated by experience - Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
goldenlightArchangel Member (Idle past 1181 days) Posts: 583 From: Roraima Peak Joined: |
-
Origin of the term Perfection: Made For It Datasegment online writes: Perfect \Per"fect\ parfet, parfait, F. parfait, L. perfectus, p. p. of perficere; Per - facere - to make
Per = ForFectus = Made there is no perfection if the Human body was made to die of old age.
For if [regular] food was made for the Human body,then the Human body would have been made for [regular] food, and it would not be brought to naught. In the same way the desires of the body were not made for the will of the flesh but to own the love of I AMand the love of I AM to own the body. In the New Living Translation (2007) the text between parenthesis exposes the texts that were inserted: it contains the mistranslations 'god' and 'elohim' in the place of EL which abbreviates ELYON [THE ONE THAT DECLARES].
You say, 'Food was made for the stomach, and the stomach for food.' (This is true, though someday [the] god will do away with both of them.) In the English Standard Version (2001) the parenthesis was substituted with a dash, eclipsing even more.
Purpose and Design:
The purpose that the compatible fruit of the solid tree was designed and made for; to give permanence to the Human body. If a person is free from aging process and death by old age for eating solely compatible fruits then the Human body was designed and made for permanence - Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
goldenlightArchangel Member (Idle past 1181 days) Posts: 583 From: Roraima Peak Joined: |
Huntard writes: ....gaining effective immortality. - To return to immortality is stopping from dying when stopping from giving continuous sequence to a search for knowledge of food that does not remain. Routine food is a type of good that never strays apart from its evil, which costs four times more expensive than it appears. Edited by CrazyDiamond7, : update
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Phage0070 Inactive Member |
CrazyDiamond7 writes: To return to immortality is stopping from dying when stopping from giving continuous sequence to a search for knowledge of food that does not remain. Routine food is a type of good that never strays apart from its evil, which costs four times more expensive than it appears. I believe the tradition is to toke then pass. You seem to just be toking, probably constantly.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Huntard Member (Idle past 2324 days) Posts: 2870 From: Limburg, The Netherlands Joined: |
Ok....
Come back when you've got something useful to say.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
onifre Member (Idle past 2980 days) Posts: 4854 From: Dark Side of the Moon Joined: |
I believe the tradition is to toke then pass. In most cases we allow 2 tokes before the pass, but no more.
You seem to just be toking, probably constantly. I resent that. My post's never sound like this guy's nonsense. - Oni
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024