Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Siliceous Ooze And Siliceous Rocks
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 314 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 1 of 3 (554560)
04-08-2010 11:40 PM


Of all the subjects in sedimentology, this is the one where I've found it hardest to get any solid information, especially such as might be suited for beginners.
I hope that you don't think that I'm just asking you to do my homework for me, I've been googling around this subject literally for weeks. And yet some things are still slightly beyond my grasp.
Let's start with a (hopefully) easy question (I shall number them for your convenience, this is number 1).
(1) When I first came across the term "radiolarian chert" I supposed that it was a term analogous to "oolitic limestone": i.e. the word radiolarian meant that in thin section one could see that it was composed of radiolarians. But I haven't found anyone saying so directly.
Gradually, by observing usage, I came to suspect that I was putting the emphasis in the wrong place and that the word chert implied that sufficient recrystalization had taken place that no radiolarian structures were to be seen any more; and that the radiolarian origin was a matter of inference rather than observation. But I can't find anyone directly stating that either.
All anyone tells me is that it's chert of radiolarian origins, but not how it is so identified.
I could make similar remarks about diatomaceous chert (mutatis mutandis).
Can anyone help me with this? Thank you.

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024