Coyote writes:
I'd much prefer to keep this site restricted to evolution vs. creation, but you libs just can't seem to do that, can you?
By libs, are you including libertarians?
While I have some sympathy with your position concerning limiting the debate to evolution vs creationism, discussions concerning religion and politics will inevitably leak out, and personally I find them quite informative.
However, despite your brilliance in arguing for reality, particularly concerning archaeology, I am puzzled as to why you choose to respond to political arguments when you yourself find such discussions off-topic.
Also, should you choose to continue to argue political topics, I for one would be very interested to discover what you are
for in contrast as to what you are
against.
Edited by anglagard, : thought I was removing a double 'to' but the zeitgeist beat me to it.
Edited by anglagard, : Never mind, ghost busted.
The idea of the sacred is quite simply one of the most conservative notions in any culture, because it seeks to turn other ideas - uncertainty, progress, change - into crimes.
Salman Rushdie
This rudderless world is not shaped by vague metaphysical forces. It is not God who kills the children. Not fate that butchers them or destiny that feeds them to the dogs. It’s us. Only us. - the character Rorschach in Watchmen