Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,890 Year: 4,147/9,624 Month: 1,018/974 Week: 345/286 Day: 1/65 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Replacing Consumerism
NoNukes
Inactive Member


(1)
Message 58 of 89 (643560)
12-08-2011 10:54 AM
Reply to: Message 57 by Phat
12-08-2011 10:36 AM


Re: The Right To Seek Opportunities For Consumerism
*Ahem.* There are some of us who believe that by seniority we have the right to have the opportunity to work a few more hours rather than letting part time (and cheaper) workers take over. Don't throw gasoline on that fire!
I understand why you might feel that way, but I don't see the logic of it. What is the basis for a right to any particular number of hours, and more specifically to overtime hours. Why shouldn't the most efficient employee be assigned to any given work task rather than the most senior employee?
If seniority doesn't translate to being more efficient, why should management respect seniority?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by Phat, posted 12-08-2011 10:36 AM Phat has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 59 by Phat, posted 12-08-2011 12:58 PM NoNukes has replied

  
NoNukes
Inactive Member


Message 61 of 89 (643566)
12-08-2011 6:06 PM
Reply to: Message 59 by Phat
12-08-2011 12:58 PM


Re: The Right To Seek Opportunities For Consumerism
The better a store manager controls expenses(such as labor) the bigger their bonus. Having a union is a check and balance against this type of favoritism.
Quite often the more experienced person is a cost saver over using cheaper labor. I certainly charge more for my services that I did when I was inexperienced.
What you describe as being favoritism is completely foreign from my own understanding of the term, and I'd guess it isn't what most people would consider favoritism. I suspect that we have a fundamental disagreement that won't be resolved by my picking further at your word usage.
I do believe unions are necessary, but if I were convinced that this kind of thing was really the reason why unions exist, I'd have to reconsider that position.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by Phat, posted 12-08-2011 12:58 PM Phat has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024