Summations Only

Panda, it's not nice when somebody proves you wrong. It's kinda frustrating.That video is poorly made. I hope you don't judge me by it!Well, it's been nice splitting hairs with you. As you say- see ya!

Yup. In this case Wikipedia is also engaged in personal incredulity Both are important to me. The former disproves your "theory", so you are ignoring it Assuming your conclusion again. Same answer as last time. I'm amazed that you think you can.

Nobody thinks that. Not necessarily, if that cloud of hydrogen was infinite. And, of course, there's lots going on before a cloud oF hydrogen. I've already agreed that I can't see beyond the OU, although you seem to think you can. When your claims are correct or reasonable, we'll agree. Nobody's going to agree to loony unfounded ideas that ignore vast swathes of contradictory evidence.

Catholic Scientist, I don't want to argue 'barycenter' with you. I think there are more interesting matters within the Observable Universe (OU) don't you?This 'accelerating expansion' the OU is engaged in. The only kind of expansion that accelerates and keeps accelerating is Inward.Did you read my 'Observational Evidence' on page 1? If you haven't, I think you should.

Catholic Scientist, I don't want to argue 'barycenter' with you. I think there are more interesting matters within the Observable Universe (OU) don't you?This 'accelerating expansion' the OU is engaged in. The only kind of expansion that accelerates and keeps accelerating is Inward.Did you read my 'Observational Evidence' on page 1? If you haven't, I think you should.

JonF, your Universe is infinite? Let's see...
Even one second after the Big-Bang, even travelling at the speed of light, your Universe couldn't have been wider than 400,000 miles.That 400,000 miles is a finite number, isn't it? So how do you go from finite to infinite. Is it something that happens fast, or perhaps only very slowly? Do tell.

JonF, your Universe is infinite? Let's see...
Even one second after the Big-Bang, even travelling at the speed of light, your Universe couldn't have been wider than 400,000 miles.That 400,000 miles is a finite number, isn't it? So how do you go from finite to infinite. Is it something that happens fast, or perhaps only very slowly? Do tell.

Yes Panda - the weight at the barycenter, includuing the weight of the teeter-totter is going to be at least 200 pounds. You can't see this?That's why you like splitting hairs - it's easier than coming up with something of your own. Well good luck, and as you say, 'Bye'.

JonF, Whatever!

Peter, do you remember what you're doing that is so consistently causing double posts? If you can tell me what is doing it then I may be able to fix it.

Percy, how can you say the expansion deccelrerated? There is absolutely no evidence - zero - for any 'slowing down' or 'deccelerating' of the expansion. If I say you are talking thru' your hat, you can't prove me wrong.The expansion began slowly, but has since accelerated and continues to accelerate.Just because I say Gravity runs the Universe, you think I'm not well, but Gravity is real and the jury is still out on 'Anti-Gravity.'It's Gravity that keeps us orbiting the sun, not Anti-Gravity. Get youir thumb out of your mouth and wake up, Percy.

Finally a reasonable question. The current theory is that the universe began with a period of inflation during which the size of the universe increased by a factor of 10⁵⁰ or so. This inflationary period accounts for a number of observable phenomena in the universePhysics - Can we test inflationary expansion of the early universe?

quote:

---

Such a period would explain why the universe today appears very nearly spatially flat on average (even though the dynamics of the expanding universe generically drive it away from flatness). It would also explain why the microwave background today has almost the same temperature in all sky directions (even though in the standard cosmology, most points of origin for the microwave radiation we see today were never within each others’ causal horizon, meaning they were never in causal contact).

---

Of course the universe is not expanding at anything like that early rate. So the rate of expansion must have slowed before accelerating as is doing today.Further it is space that is expanding. You talk about us epxanding towards a black hole as if expansion means that objects in space are all moving apart through space. This is absolutely the wrong picture of what expansion is all about.Edited by NoNukes, : No reason given.

Panmdas, I'm not interersted in this 'average density' thing. I'm getting kinda tired of answering your posts.What I want to know is; Can you see beyond the Observable Universe?

Panmdas, I'm not interersted in this 'average density' thing. I'm getting kinda tired of answering your posts.What I want to know is; Can you see beyond the Observable Universe?

Hi Admin, it's my fault - sometimes when I'm scrolling thru', I see something that I think needs an answer and only later I realise I've already answered. Sorry, I'll watch that!