Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,924 Year: 4,181/9,624 Month: 1,052/974 Week: 11/368 Day: 11/11 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   reply to Faith: Deposition and erosion
AdminSylas
Inactive Member


Message 2 of 5 (191860)
03-16-2005 3:28 AM


Thread moved here from the Proposed New Topics forum.

AdminSylas
Inactive Member


Message 3 of 5 (191865)
03-16-2005 3:35 AM


Thread moved here from the Geology and the Great Flood forum.
Oops. I'm having a very bad day as admin.
I have moved this back into Proposed New Topics. Sorry about that! This original post here is given as a reply to Message 298, posted by Faith.
On reflection, this post is not yet the kind of continuation requested. The previous thread was getting a bit out of hand, with lots of she said, he said, I said exchanges, and not always very polite. This post is continuing in the same old vein. The substance is very strong, but still think we can start with a bit less focus on persons.
We do want to start up the topic again, but please take into account the requests of Adminjar in Message 310.
jar writes:
If there is any point in continuing let's start a new PNT. Also, if that step is taken please try to narrow the focus to one small part such as how an initial layer is created, eroded, modified and preserved.
Also from Admin in Message 303.
Admin writes:
To everyone: please stay focused on the topic and avoid the "did not, did too" and "you don't realize how wrong you are" digressions.
Past experience teaches that by 300 posts most threads have drifted way off topic, but that's not the case here. This thread is a bit repetitive, but this seems natural. I don't know if one of the moderators will close this thread, but if they do I hope someone proposes a continuation thread. I think the questions being raised on both sides will find better answers if the discussion continues.
To that end, we want to be pretty strict about the start of the new thread. Thanks for this but I think we can get off to a more focused start. Perhaps I should have let Adminjar handle this proposal.
This message has been edited by AdminSylas, 03-16-2005 03:46 AM

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by roxrkool, posted 03-16-2005 11:37 AM AdminSylas has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024