We know there's a God because...

ICANT,You completely failed to address the OP...Without religious texts (& indeed, with) we would need to know something of god/s, & how they would create the universe in order to predict phenomena that would lead us to potential evidence that creation occurred.Since we don't, we can't. No, that's because you have a christian prick as president.Mark

Buzsaw, Why doesn't different cultures coming to different supernatural conclusions simply speak for humanity's desire to come to a conclusion?It is in no way necessarily true that a creator would create his creations this way. Given that this is the case, it can't be evidence. That is, we can't make a prediction about what the creator would have done because we simply don't know how they would have done it.Mark

---

There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't

CTD, People like me are in the habit of habitually dismissing subjective opinion. The miracle is that you had that many tyres blow out on you, they should have stopped doing that decades ago because of design improvements. But anyway, how many tyre blowouts occur before a fatality occurs to the driver? You haven't a scooby. As far as you are concerned it could be anything, meaning you have no idea if 6 is miraculous or merely humdrum.Mark

---

There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't

CTD, Insults? I fail to see where I insulted you. You posted evidentially vacuous subjective opinion & claimed the rest of us can't see the evidence. This is your problem, not mine for pointing it out.I directly responded to your point: My point is that your "evidence" is entirely subjective, you have no idea whatsoever what the non-miracle state is compared to the miracle state. As such, you are utterly unable to claim anything as evidence of the miraculous. Very well, please supply the statistics of tyre blowouts that should result in death/injury if miracles don't occur, & do the same if miracles do indeed happen. Failure to do this renders you completely unable to test the hypothesis that a miracle has occurred. It also means your claim that the rest of us are dismissing evidence is false, there is no evidence to be dismissed.Mark

---

There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't

CTD, Oh, please! No, you said: Would it hurt to be accurate? What would this show? Does it test how often it should happen with miracles & without? If not it's still a subjective opinion.Mark

---

There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't

CTD, Bullshit. I didn't quote that, I quoted what I was responding to in the very first instance. Why say you said something that I didn't quote you on? I'm sure you are. You have failed to provide an objective test in order to determine whether miracles pertain to tyre blowouts or not. At least your evasion is honest.Mark

---

There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't

CTD, No, not at all. In fact, when pushed to provide data that would allow us to predict the miraculousness of your claims, namely tyre blowout phenomenon you failed to supply, claiming you were "tired". I'm not doing this, I'm asking you to provide what is required in order to predict & test your own claim. Why is this such a difficult concept to get over to you?If you are unable to predict the frequency of miraculous phemenon in this case objectively, then it is subjective opinion.Mark

---

There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't

CTD, No, you didn't supply a method of determining what is necessary. & that tells us what, exactly?How do I tell by following your "method" what ratio of blowouts is un-miraculous, & what is miraculous?Mark

---

There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't