Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,906 Year: 4,163/9,624 Month: 1,034/974 Week: 361/286 Day: 4/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Should a Deist pray? Response to jar's idea of God.
Trixie
Member (Idle past 3735 days)
Posts: 1011
From: Edinburgh
Joined: 01-03-2004


Message 91 of 165 (272545)
12-24-2005 5:58 PM
Reply to: Message 86 by randman
12-24-2005 5:34 PM


Re: Response!
I'd appreciate an answer other than "yawn", but if you can't manage that I do understand. If you want to stick with the intellectually devastating "yawn", I'd appreciate a retraction of the comment you made that I am reading God's mind. Support it or retract it, randman, forum guidelines. You may not be familiar with these.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 86 by randman, posted 12-24-2005 5:34 PM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 92 by randman, posted 12-24-2005 6:00 PM Trixie has replied

  
randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4928 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005


Message 92 of 165 (272546)
12-24-2005 6:00 PM
Reply to: Message 91 by Trixie
12-24-2005 5:58 PM


Re: Response!
I posted yawn rather than a more stern rebuke (though not as mod) of you breaking the forum guidelines. You made false personal attacks on a thread calling for none.
Please retract them...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 91 by Trixie, posted 12-24-2005 5:58 PM Trixie has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 93 by Trixie, posted 12-24-2005 6:29 PM randman has not replied

  
Trixie
Member (Idle past 3735 days)
Posts: 1011
From: Edinburgh
Joined: 01-03-2004


Message 93 of 165 (272554)
12-24-2005 6:29 PM
Reply to: Message 92 by randman
12-24-2005 6:00 PM


Re: Response!
Rebuke to your heart's content, but support or retract in the meantime.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 92 by randman, posted 12-24-2005 6:00 PM randman has not replied

  
Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3991
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 6.9


Message 94 of 165 (272566)
12-24-2005 8:48 PM
Reply to: Message 89 by Faith
12-24-2005 5:54 PM


Re: Response!
Faith writes:
What we see is not what God made, but a distorted remnant of what God made, because of the Fall. That is, I'm sure we WERE made with a functioning Vitamin C gene, but it is one of our no doubt millions {ABE: OK, tens of thousands} of genetic casualties of the Fall over the last few millennia.
So why do some other creatures have functioning vitamin C genes?
It can't be because only humankind fell, because some other creatures also have broken vitamin C genes.
Faith writes:
Is it all right with you if some of us disagree with you about this no-supporting-evidence bit? Do you think you could make room for a dissenting view here? I mean, I for one have said over and over that I base my belief on evidence.
The essential difference is that you cite materials and feelings as unverifiable as belief as evidence to support beliefs: that is not evidence, it is merely belief.
Personally, I think that you, like randman, have a snowball's chance in Hell of seeing Heaven, but I have no difficulty accepting your dissenting beliefs on that score, either.
What I refuse to accept is your insistence that your beliefs about your beliefs constitute evidence in support of your beliefs.

Save lives! Click here!
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 89 by Faith, posted 12-24-2005 5:54 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 95 by randman, posted 12-25-2005 12:03 AM Omnivorous has replied
 Message 97 by Faith, posted 12-25-2005 12:20 AM Omnivorous has replied

  
randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4928 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005


Message 95 of 165 (272581)
12-25-2005 12:03 AM
Reply to: Message 94 by Omnivorous
12-24-2005 8:48 PM


Re: Response!
another evo telling people he thinks they are scum or some such, deserve to go to he ll, and all the while thinks it's other people that do that

This message is a reply to:
 Message 94 by Omnivorous, posted 12-24-2005 8:48 PM Omnivorous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 96 by Funkaloyd, posted 12-25-2005 12:10 AM randman has not replied
 Message 102 by Omnivorous, posted 12-25-2005 2:44 PM randman has not replied

  
Funkaloyd
Inactive Member


Message 96 of 165 (272583)
12-25-2005 12:10 AM
Reply to: Message 95 by randman
12-25-2005 12:03 AM


Re: Response!
randman writes:
another evo telling people he thinks they are scum or some such, deserve to go to he ll
Omni didn't say that, he said that he believes that it's unlikely that Faith will get to heaven.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 95 by randman, posted 12-25-2005 12:03 AM randman has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 103 by Omnivorous, posted 12-25-2005 2:47 PM Funkaloyd has replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 97 of 165 (272585)
12-25-2005 12:20 AM
Reply to: Message 94 by Omnivorous
12-24-2005 8:48 PM


Re: Response!
What we see is not what God made, but a distorted remnant of what God made, because of the Fall. That is, I'm sure we WERE made with a functioning Vitamin C gene, but it is one of our no doubt millions {ABE: OK, tens of thousands} of genetic casualties of the Fall over the last few millennia.
quote:
So why do some other creatures have functioning vitamin C genes?
I don't mind if you want to ask further questions, although it is off topic, but the reason I said what I said was to make it clear that creationists do have a different explanation for the flaws in creation that noncreationists see as caused by God. The proper thing to do would be to acknowledge that. Nobody expects you to agree.
It can't be because only humankind fell, because some other creatures also have broken vitamin C genes.
Again this is off topic and you should merely have acknowledged the point. Nobody is requiring you to believe it. The entire Creation was cursed at the Fall, and subject to death. Broken vitamin C genes or any other genes, in both humans and animals, are one way death has manifested. Please don't argue this further as it is off topic. This is a reasonable answer and if you think it stupid and ridiculous as you generally think anything I say is, please save it for another thread. Thank you.
Is it all right with you if some of us disagree with you about this no-supporting-evidence bit? Do you think you could make room for a dissenting view here? I mean, I for one have said over and over that I base my belief on evidence.
quote:
The essential difference is that you cite materials and feelings as unverifiable as belief as evidence to support beliefs: that is not evidence, it is merely belief.
I don't care what you think of my evidence, that is not the topic here. I'm not trying to persuade you or anyone of my beliefs, I am merely stating that nobody believes anything without what they regard to be sufficient evidence, and the idea that there is some kind of blind belief is simply false. Again I could not care less what you think of my evidence.
Personally, I think that you, like randman, have a snowball's chance in Hell of seeing Heaven, but I have no difficulty accepting your dissenting beliefs on that score, either.
What I refuse to accept is your insistence that your beliefs about your beliefs constitute evidence in support of your beliefs.
I haven't asked you to accept anything, only to respect other people's views, and that other human beings don't think like you.
This message has been edited by Faith, 12-25-2005 12:22 AM
This message has been edited by Faith, 12-25-2005 12:28 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 94 by Omnivorous, posted 12-24-2005 8:48 PM Omnivorous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 101 by Theodoric, posted 12-25-2005 1:09 PM Faith has replied
 Message 104 by Omnivorous, posted 12-25-2005 2:54 PM Faith has replied

  
ReverendDG
Member (Idle past 4140 days)
Posts: 1119
From: Topeka,kansas
Joined: 06-06-2005


Message 98 of 165 (272601)
12-25-2005 12:44 AM
Reply to: Message 90 by randman
12-24-2005 5:57 PM


Re: Response!
Thank you Faith....now if the evos are honest and have integrity, they will never pretend again this has not been answered...but fat chance of that!
Wow, and you are what a pillar of honesty and integrity?, This whole thread is just a chance for you to pigeon-hole someones beliefs that you don't agree with, I mean what does the title have to do with anything in your posts?
I vote an admin change the title to attacking a personal belief because randman can't get over it
by the way no as a deist i do not pray to a god that doesn't give a crap anymore

This message is a reply to:
 Message 90 by randman, posted 12-24-2005 5:57 PM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 99 by Faith, posted 12-25-2005 10:52 AM ReverendDG has replied
 Message 115 by randman, posted 12-26-2005 1:13 AM ReverendDG has not replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 99 of 165 (272607)
12-25-2005 10:52 AM
Reply to: Message 98 by ReverendDG
12-25-2005 12:44 AM


Re: Response!
What's the call for your response here? The point was simple: There is a creationist answer to the common complaint that God created a flawed universe, and that is that He didn't, it was the result of human sin. Are you just off topic or what. Have a Merry Christmas.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 98 by ReverendDG, posted 12-25-2005 12:44 AM ReverendDG has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 105 by ReverendDG, posted 12-25-2005 5:08 PM Faith has replied

  
Parasomnium
Member
Posts: 2224
Joined: 07-15-2003


Message 100 of 165 (272614)
12-25-2005 11:18 AM
Reply to: Message 65 by randman
12-23-2005 7:55 PM


Re: Strange logic
randman writes:
To claim God would never design life forms is to claim you know what God will and will not do. So you are clearly wrong.
Well, I agree that I would be wrong if I claimed that. But I never did. I would be very surprised if you could point out where I said that.
Why would a God intervene in people's personal lives but abstain from any intervention in the formation and development of life on earth?
I've already given you my answer, even though you dimissed it as off-topic. God supposedly can do as he pleases. So the answer to your question is: why wouldn't he? It's up to him.

Did you know that most of the time your computer is doing nothing? What if you could make it do something really useful? Like helping scientists understand diseases? Your computer could even be instrumental in finding a cure for HIV/AIDS. Wouldn't that be something? If you agree, then join World Community Grid now and download a simple, free tool that lets you and your computer do your share in helping humanity. After all, you are part of it, so why not take part in it?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by randman, posted 12-23-2005 7:55 PM randman has not replied

  
Theodoric
Member
Posts: 9201
From: Northwest, WI, USA
Joined: 08-15-2005
Member Rating: 3.2


Message 101 of 165 (272631)
12-25-2005 1:09 PM
Reply to: Message 97 by Faith
12-25-2005 12:20 AM


Re: Response!
I haven't asked you to accept anything, only to respect other people's views, and that other human beings don't think like you.
It is amazing that you demand this but refuse to showrespect to those that disagree with you.
Your holier than thou attitude is exasperating.
This message has been edited by Theodoric, 12-25-2005 08:35 PM

Barb's Site
Exposing the radical right with facts

This message is a reply to:
 Message 97 by Faith, posted 12-25-2005 12:20 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 110 by Faith, posted 12-25-2005 9:54 PM Theodoric has not replied

  
Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3991
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 6.9


Message 102 of 165 (272646)
12-25-2005 2:44 PM
Reply to: Message 95 by randman
12-25-2005 12:03 AM


Re: Response!
Indeed--it was a like response, rand.
I don't think you're going to hell--don't believe in the place; you, on the other hand, like faith, make no bones about believing in my eternal torment. I think the very notion of hell is symptomatic of the worst of human impulses.
And I think you've evolved a long way from scum.

Save lives! Click here!
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 95 by randman, posted 12-25-2005 12:03 AM randman has not replied

  
Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3991
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 6.9


Message 103 of 165 (272647)
12-25-2005 2:47 PM
Reply to: Message 96 by Funkaloyd
12-25-2005 12:10 AM


Re: Response!
Funkaloyd writes:
Omni didn't say that, he said that he believes that it's unlikely that Faith will get to heaven.
That's correct, Funk. I don't believe in that place, either.
It's good to see rand is consisent in his distortions of others' statements, though--provides some certainty in an uncertain world.

Save lives! Click here!
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 96 by Funkaloyd, posted 12-25-2005 12:10 AM Funkaloyd has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 109 by Funkaloyd, posted 12-25-2005 8:34 PM Omnivorous has not replied

  
Omnivorous
Member
Posts: 3991
From: Adirondackia
Joined: 07-21-2005
Member Rating: 6.9


Message 104 of 165 (272648)
12-25-2005 2:54 PM
Reply to: Message 97 by Faith
12-25-2005 12:20 AM


Re: Response!
It not off-topic to respond to your invalid evidentiary claims, Faith.
If you choose to make any assertions about any evidence to support any post, any observations I have to make about the illusory nature of that evidence is germane.
A Merry Christmas to you, too, and a Happy New Year as well!

Save lives! Click here!
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 97 by Faith, posted 12-25-2005 12:20 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 111 by Faith, posted 12-25-2005 10:00 PM Omnivorous has not replied

  
ReverendDG
Member (Idle past 4140 days)
Posts: 1119
From: Topeka,kansas
Joined: 06-06-2005


Message 105 of 165 (272664)
12-25-2005 5:08 PM
Reply to: Message 99 by Faith
12-25-2005 10:52 AM


Re: Response!
thats not the topic, i answered the topic, and the rest of randmans little rant calls for jar to explain himself yet again, your response seems more OT, what does anything you posted have to do with anything thats been said in this thread
As I will keep saying, Randman doesn't like the responses jar gives him, so he will keep posting this noise
I'm sorry too, but this is about belief in something no one can answer -- The mind of god

This message is a reply to:
 Message 99 by Faith, posted 12-25-2005 10:52 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 112 by Faith, posted 12-25-2005 10:01 PM ReverendDG has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024