Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,909 Year: 4,166/9,624 Month: 1,037/974 Week: 364/286 Day: 7/13 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Why is Evolution at odds with Christianity?
Karl
Inactive Member


Message 14 of 56 (49085)
08-07-2003 7:20 AM
Reply to: Message 12 by Agent Uranium [GPC]
08-04-2003 6:44 PM


They do so because Jesus said it was the heart of it - the greatest commandments - love God, love your neighbour.
Christianity is not founded on original sin. Augustine made a lot of it, but he's not Holy Writ. It doesn't matter whether our "sinful" impulses come from a historical fall or evolutionary imperatives - they still harm our relationships with other people, and with God. This is what Jesus came to heal.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by Agent Uranium [GPC], posted 08-04-2003 6:44 PM Agent Uranium [GPC] has not replied

  
Karl
Inactive Member


Message 17 of 56 (49345)
08-08-2003 8:28 AM


Newsflash!
Darn it! After twenty years of thinking I was a Christian, Paul's pointed out I'm not.
Damn it!
There was me thinking it was about following Jesus. Thinking it was about obeying His commands. But no. It's all about whether you take Genesis 1 literally.
So, Paul. Suppose I take Genesis 1 literally. Of course, I now have to take many statements in Genesis 2 as being non-literal. So I've picked and chosen. Or I could take Genesis 2 literally, in which case I have to scratch my head over Genesis 1. Which do I choose? Seeing as I can't "pick and choose", how do I decide which way to go?
I find "Yes there are parts of the Bible which are written in a symbolic way. Yet there is nothing in the creation account to suggest it is symbolic. !" a particulary interesting statement. You see, we have here a poetic device, including a refrain "Evening passed and morning came, that was the nth day". We have a structure of three days of preparation followed by three of infilling. We follow this up with a narrative (conflicting in the literal interpretation) about people called "man" and "mother of all", involving trees with fruit like "life" and "knowledge", and a talking snake. Now I don't know what kind of world you inhabit, but these features scream "symbolic" in letters of neon, eight feet high, to me.

  
Karl
Inactive Member


Message 43 of 56 (49921)
08-11-2003 10:29 AM
Reply to: Message 36 by paul nicholson
08-11-2003 9:01 AM


You've moved very quickly through the creationist flowchart. Usually we get a few more PRATTs or hiding behind complete ignorance of science before we get the "You'll go to Hell" or the "You'll have to answer to God" bits.
Question - where in the Bible does it say that the Judgement has anything to do with biodiversity origin models?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by paul nicholson, posted 08-11-2003 9:01 AM paul nicholson has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 44 by John, posted 08-11-2003 11:45 AM Karl has not replied

  
Karl
Inactive Member


Message 45 of 56 (49945)
08-11-2003 12:03 PM


Point Refuted A Thousand Times

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024