Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Happy Resolutions
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 10 of 35 (373924)
01-03-2007 6:38 AM
Reply to: Message 9 by arachnophilia
01-02-2007 12:37 AM


Re: no more resolutions.
Very good point Arach!
Many people make bold pronouncments about how they are going to turn over a new leaf etc.
Most of these life changes can be best achieved incrementally.
I undertake to make about 10 incremental changes in my life over the next 10 months; starting with having a smaller lunch (it's normally a fat mans feast!).

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by arachnophilia, posted 01-02-2007 12:37 AM arachnophilia has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by Phat, posted 01-03-2007 8:45 AM Larni has replied
 Message 31 by Phat, posted 01-01-2014 6:46 AM Larni has replied

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 16 of 35 (373983)
01-03-2007 11:45 AM
Reply to: Message 14 by Phat
01-03-2007 8:45 AM


Re: Incremental changes work wonders
Yup.
If you have 10 meaningful goals that you are able to achieve spread over a month, you can keep a record of this, (it really helps progress ) and you do them (or most of them), you can see what you have achieved.
This fosters a perception of (self as) one who does succeed (because you have chosen appropriate goals- such as my goal to have a smaller lunch at work) and this help raise your game when it comes to sticking with the task at hand.
The big problem with new years resloutions is they are all or nothing. They are invariably massive life changes that virtually no one could stick to and when we fail we feel like failiures and avoid further opportunities to fail.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by Phat, posted 01-03-2007 8:45 AM Phat has not replied

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 21 of 35 (645950)
12-31-2011 9:14 PM


Thread necromancy!
I resolve to drink less and try to have some kids. My unsupported assertation is that I could be a good father.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong.
Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


(2)
Message 32 of 35 (715143)
01-01-2014 7:08 PM
Reply to: Message 31 by Phat
01-01-2014 6:46 AM


Re: 2014
I'm fatter than I was.
But I turned 40 this month so I'm definitely, honestly, really going to be more active and less pork oriented, this time.
Hope you had a good new year, mate.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by Phat, posted 01-01-2014 6:46 AM Phat has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024