...time then all the dates you refer to would be incorrect.
So some brainy scientist says no others say yes and the fight keeps going. There will never be an end.
So you're saying that there are a few individuals (with a stated axe to grind and no particular expertise in the area) who give a few examples of what they think are problems. These same individuals ignore a huge amount of other data. From this you conclude that there are real problems?
This you conclude even though 1,000's of other individuals who do have expertise in the area disagree. You stick with this even though other data showing the correctness of the method is ignored by your few. You continue to think your few might have something even though there are many other methods which produce results showing your few wrong.
This is a logical process in your mind?
[This message has been edited by NosyNed, 04-26-2004]