Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,912 Year: 4,169/9,624 Month: 1,040/974 Week: 367/286 Day: 10/13 Hour: 0/1


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Geology and the Great Flood ⇒

Flood Stories

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Flood Stories
Tranquility Base
Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display
Message 51 of 56 (10701)
05-31-2002 12:09 AM 		Reply to: Message 48 by edge
05-30-2002 10:23 PM

Edge, I personally think the vast fast current epeiric sea deposits and layered non-marine deposits, that comprise the majority of the geological column, are diagnostic of the flood.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by edge, posted 05-30-2002 10:23 PM edge has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 52 by edge, posted 05-31-2002 12:34 AM Tranquility Base has replied
  
Tranquility Base
Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display
Message 53 of 56 (10715)
05-31-2002 1:17 AM 		Reply to: Message 52 by edge
05-31-2002 12:34 AM

I'll read that stuff again but when I did read it last time I felt there is no reason it wouldn't apply to catastrophic transgressions/regressions. We actaully agree on a lot of this stuff.
​
You get sandstone/shale/limestone and then back to shale/sandstone I think due to the water depth. OK, I guess in our scenario we have to argue hydrodynamic sorting which is qualitatively different to your scenario?
This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by edge, posted 05-31-2002 12:34 AM edge has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 54 by edge, posted 05-31-2002 11:02 AM Tranquility Base has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024