quote:
Originally posted by TrueCreation:
--Welcome to the forum edVento.
"I always find it amazing to see Creationists proclaim the Flood story as a "truth" that helps proves creationism."
--Your missunderstood when you use the word 'proves', there can be no proof on any historical implication accept on the fact of existance in all technicallity.
You misunderstand if you think you can prove the historical existence of something without resorting to implication.
Unless, of course, when you say "in all technicallity" you mean that you are working with a specialist definition of "proof" which distinguishes in some way between implied historical existence and other historical implications. If so, let's have it.
™ Version 4.2