Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,901 Year: 4,158/9,624 Month: 1,029/974 Week: 356/286 Day: 12/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Humans of the future?
Bushido
Inactive Member


Message 52 of 82 (127784)
07-26-2004 12:43 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by tubi417
06-26-2004 11:49 PM


This is just an idea that i'm trying to expand on currently through my research at the university. I have always had the idea that instead of the progression of the human genome into some more genetically sophisticated being, humans are experiencing genetic degredation resulting in the more prominent diseases of heredity which we are seeing more and more of in this day than ever before.
Possible mechanisms of this degredation could be a bottle neck that may have happened in our ancient history. This would cause less diversity within the genome, thus, promoting imbreeding. I also think that it is a possibility that random genetic drift may have much more of an impact on our species than most think. In many areas we can classify numbers of subpopulations that have a great chance of fixation of deletarious alleles, especially in the poorer areas where people tend to live their entire lives within a distinct geographic location and interbreed with other people native to that area.
I have witnessed this first hand traveling through the impoverished areas of the midwest where famillel disorders are common.
Maybe this is happening on a greater, yet much slower scale, world-wide.
Anyway, i think this is an interesting alternative view to the thought that man is evolving through forward progression into some more advanced and better fit, being.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by tubi417, posted 06-26-2004 11:49 PM tubi417 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 54 by NosyNed, posted 07-27-2004 11:16 PM Bushido has replied

  
Bushido
Inactive Member


Message 56 of 82 (128377)
07-28-2004 12:10 PM
Reply to: Message 54 by NosyNed
07-27-2004 11:16 PM


Re: But Still!
quote:
Humans aren't going anywhere other than being selected for the current environment.
Now would you agree or disagree that our current enviroment has been manipulated to the point were selection has been minimized. Disease is still in existence, which is the primary tool of selection on our population in my opinion, since predation and enviromental dangers have a low effect on humans. Yet as technology advances, our species seems to be moving further away from "survival of the fittest," causing diversity within our genome. It is to my understanding that natural selection aids in diversifying a population which was contrary to the popular pre-Malthus beleif of genetic blending.
Now, with this in mind, a minimization of the effects of natural selection would cause a population's gene pool to gradually change from diverse to uniform. My point goes beyond the mistake I regretfully made in the choice of words within my last post. I am trying to say that, if in fact, natural selection has been sedated in our culture or will be in the future, do you think this will lead to a degredation in our own genome due to the effects of random genetic drift?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by NosyNed, posted 07-27-2004 11:16 PM NosyNed has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 57 by SEBASTES, posted 10-19-2004 2:03 PM Bushido has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024