This is narrow minded fascist repressive medieval religion, known today as scientism, the same business on the other side of the street, and you are a rank and file brainwashed member.
That is an uncalled for assertion. It added nothing to the discussion and is also totally unsupported.
You believe scientific methodologies are the ONLY avenue to determine truth.
Unless you can define what you mean by truth, that is a meaningless statement.
There are things that can best be answered by science. Some examples are
- the age of the earth.
- the age of the universe.
- the age of fossils
- whether or not some town was occuppied during a particular period.
- who built the pyramids.
- what the longest land meridian is.
- stellar distances.
- geography.
There are also things which science cannot adequately address. Some examples are
- the existence of a GOD or Gods.
- the non-existence of GOD or Gods.
- morality.
- ethics.
- questions related to WHY something exists.
You do not seem to outline what it is YOU are addressing when you mention things such as truth. Before anyone can even debate such issues it will be necessary for you to define your terms.
It would be a good idea for you to return to the OP. There, Ned lays out some basic steps.
NosyNed writes:
I suggest that to support this claim WT should give a specific example where there is a big difference between two opposing points of view.
Then he can show the evidence that exists that both sides can agree on.
Then he can discuss the "scientific" ("god sense removed") interpretation. Following that he can show a different interpretation and show why the first interpretation is directly influenced by the "wrong" worldview.
So, can you give us one specific example. Then can you provide evidence that both sides can agree even exists. Finally, can you show how having a given worldview effects the interpretation of evidence.
So far, you have provided no evidence. You have cut & pasted assertions from Milton, but they are simply assertions. There is no evidence involved.
Can you pick, as a beginning point, one specific case?
Aslan is not a Tame Lion