Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Chick tracks misrepresent the intellectual veracity of scientists
sfs
Member (Idle past 2564 days)
Posts: 464
From: Cambridge, MA USA
Joined: 08-27-2003


Message 8 of 15 (162813)
11-23-2004 11:47 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by Lithodid-Man
11-23-2004 11:13 PM


I don't think the phenomenon is unique to creationism. If people have no direct experience of an area of human endeavor, they tend to assume that mastering it can't really be that big a deal. Some years ago I saw the results of a survey of fans of professional sports, and how well they could play the sport. I don't remember the exact figures, but a ridiculously large fraction of the people in the stands thought that, with a little training, they could do as well as the guys on the field. And many people have little or no direct experience with science or scientists.
I would hope that higher education would expand people's awareness of what they don't know, but I'm not sure that it always does; some people seem to assume that because they're educated in one field, they're experts in all. Philosophy seems to bring out the worst in people in this regard: I've seen more than one highly educated person who knew next to nothing about philosophy trying to lecture a professional philosopher on the subject.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by Lithodid-Man, posted 11-23-2004 11:13 PM Lithodid-Man has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by coffee_addict, posted 11-24-2004 12:56 AM sfs has not replied
 Message 11 by Lithodid-Man, posted 11-24-2004 3:18 PM sfs has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024