Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 0/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   A listing of the contradictions and errors in the bible.
Randy
Member (Idle past 6278 days)
Posts: 420
From: Cincinnati OH USA
Joined: 07-19-2002


Message 10 of 158 (16443)
09-02-2002 4:12 PM
Reply to: Message 6 by blitz77
09-02-2002 8:50 AM


I don’t really like laundry list posts like from either side but I find this interesting from the site that Blitz77 liked to
http://www.geocities.com/...7273/biblicalcontradictions.html
quote:
Gen 6:13-8:22. - The account of the flood and Noah's Ark-
Charge: This is myth, but the Bible presents it as history. It is myth because not all animals over the whole world were destroyed, for certainly they did not all fit in that most limited ark!
Reply: It cannot be denied that Noah did not have room for every single species of every kind of animal on board. Nor is there any need for such an assertion. For the Hebrew word "'erets," which is here translated "the world" or "the earth" for us, is also commonly and properly translated "land" or "country." So instead of "whole earth," which is erroneous, we ought to read "whole land," which will do no matter how much of the earth was flooded, and still gets the Hebrew right. So this charge fails, just as the one before last, for letting itself get caught in the stranglehold of poor translation.
This quote is from Blitz’s post
quote:
As you will notice from these sites, many of the supposed "contradictions" are from the translations-using the original Hebrew, they disappear.
So YECs you should see that when the Hebrew is properly translated as Blitz requires Noah’s flood was NOT global.
Randy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by blitz77, posted 09-02-2002 8:50 AM blitz77 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 11 by nos482, posted 09-02-2002 4:49 PM Randy has not replied

  
Randy
Member (Idle past 6278 days)
Posts: 420
From: Cincinnati OH USA
Joined: 07-19-2002


Message 17 of 158 (16827)
09-07-2002 12:55 AM
Reply to: Message 13 by gene90
09-06-2002 7:43 PM


quote:
Historical sources (including, as I understand it, the work of Flavius Josephus) do indicate that the event was witnessed by thousands. Unfortunately only a few wrote about it so that point isn't terribly convincing now that those witnesses have died.
I have done some looking into this and have read a translation of the relevant parts of Josephus’ history of the Jews a couple of years ago. I think you can find it online. While Josephus probably mentioned Jesus in his original work, and I happen to think he did, it was probably only a brief mention and the story was almost certainly greatly enhanced by a Christian Monk who did a translation of Josephus in the third century IIRC. While I believe that Jesus existed there is actually very little hard evidence of the fact that stands up to serious scrutiny. I will try to look for some references when I have time.
On the other hand, I have been to Jerusalem and walked the Way of the Cross and I think that experience would have left me without doubt that Jesus was a real person who was crucified if I ever had any doubt in the first place. Even our Jewish guide did not doubt the existence of Jesus.
Randy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by gene90, posted 09-06-2002 7:43 PM gene90 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by gene90, posted 09-07-2002 10:54 AM Randy has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024