|
Author
|
Topic: Bush Arrested In Canada for war crimes
|
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 506 days) Posts: 3645 From: Indianapolis, IN Joined: 03-29-2004
|
|
Message 1 of 80 (165081)
12-04-2004 5:26 AM
|
|
|
Read it here at World News CNN.
quote:
OTTAWA, CANADA (AP) -- On the first of his two-day planned visit to Canada, George W. Bush was taken into custody by Canadian authorities citing war crime charges. Under Canadian law, even a non-citizen can be charged for crimes committed outside of Canada once that individual enters the country. The arrest claims that President Bush has been "party to the crime of torturing prisoners held in Guantnamo Bay and Abu Ghraib." Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin released a written statement indicating that "proceedings have commenced against President George W. Bush under the Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act (s. 9(3))."
You can read more at that page.
Hate world. Revenge soon!
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 2 by crashfrog, posted 12-04-2004 11:40 AM | | coffee_addict has replied | | | Message 6 by RAZD, posted 12-04-2004 2:32 PM | | coffee_addict has not replied |
|
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 506 days) Posts: 3645 From: Indianapolis, IN Joined: 03-29-2004
|
|
|
Message 3 of 80 (165141)
12-04-2004 1:05 PM
|
Reply to: Message 2 by crashfrog
12-04-2004 11:40 AM
|
|
When I first looked at it, I was so excited... for about 3 seconds before...
Hate world. Revenge soon!
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 2 by crashfrog, posted 12-04-2004 11:40 AM | | crashfrog has not replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 4 by NosyNed, posted 12-04-2004 1:12 PM | | coffee_addict has replied |
|
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 506 days) Posts: 3645 From: Indianapolis, IN Joined: 03-29-2004
|
|
|
Message 5 of 80 (165151)
12-04-2004 1:23 PM
|
Reply to: Message 4 by NosyNed
12-04-2004 1:12 PM
|
|
Re: excited before
This is why I "blame Canada" for our situation. Why can't you guys just invade the US and free us liberals from the savage hands of the conservatives? Just send into the states everything you have and hope for the best. If it turns out to be a disasterous campaign, then at least you Canadians will be remembered as the anti-evil (or the good) knights of North America. I say you guys try to take D.C. in 2 days.
Hate world. Revenge soon!
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 4 by NosyNed, posted 12-04-2004 1:12 PM | | NosyNed has not replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 7 by crashfrog, posted 12-04-2004 2:55 PM | | coffee_addict has not replied |
|
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 506 days) Posts: 3645 From: Indianapolis, IN Joined: 03-29-2004
|
|
|
Message 16 of 80 (165531)
12-06-2004 1:11 AM
|
Reply to: Message 14 by NosyNed
12-05-2004 7:23 PM
|
|
Re: And what we want one of those for?
Ned writes: Then we'd have WMD and be even more subject to invasion by the only country we have to fear in today's world.
But look at the bright side. Even if there is an alien invasion, Canada is safe simply because the US is right next door. Canada is like America's little brother. Hehehe
Hate world. Revenge soon!
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 14 by NosyNed, posted 12-05-2004 7:23 PM | | NosyNed has not replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 17 by berberry, posted 12-06-2004 1:25 AM | | coffee_addict has replied |
|
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 506 days) Posts: 3645 From: Indianapolis, IN Joined: 03-29-2004
|
|
|
Message 18 of 80 (165537)
12-06-2004 1:53 AM
|
Reply to: Message 17 by berberry
12-06-2004 1:25 AM
|
|
Re: And what we want one of those for?
Ok, let us summarize the big happy family. Canada - Uncle Sam's little liberal brother who is more tolerant than his older brother. Liberia - Uncle Sam's abandoned son England - Uncle Sam's dad who didn't want his son to move out on his own France - Uncle Sam's mom who wanted to help Sam to move out just so she could revenge on the settlement when she was divorcing England Israel - Uncle Sam's spoiled son Puerto Rico - Uncle Sam's adopted son Cuba - Uncle Sam's adopted rebellious son Can anyone help me think of who Uncle Sam's wife could be?
Hate world. Revenge soon!
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 17 by berberry, posted 12-06-2004 1:25 AM | | berberry has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 19 by berberry, posted 12-06-2004 2:27 AM | | coffee_addict has replied | | | Message 25 by Silent H, posted 12-10-2004 4:33 AM | | coffee_addict has not replied | | | Message 80 by Shaz, posted 01-07-2005 10:13 AM | | coffee_addict has not replied |
|
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 506 days) Posts: 3645 From: Indianapolis, IN Joined: 03-29-2004
|
|
|
Message 20 of 80 (165541)
12-06-2004 2:36 AM
|
Reply to: Message 19 by berberry
12-06-2004 2:27 AM
|
|
Re: And what we want one of those for?
Oh yeah! Saudi Arabia is perfect. She'd be an obedient wife anyway.
Hate world. Revenge soon!
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 19 by berberry, posted 12-06-2004 2:27 AM | | berberry has not replied |
|
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 506 days) Posts: 3645 From: Indianapolis, IN Joined: 03-29-2004
|
|
|
Message 23 of 80 (166667)
12-09-2004 7:11 PM
|
Reply to: Message 22 by SoulSlay
12-09-2004 5:46 PM
|
|
SoulSlay writes: I know for sure that Iraq would be Uncle Sam's bitch.
Nah, I see Iraq as Uncle Sam's rape victim. Before the rape. Uncle Sam: Iraq is a bad girl. Someone needs to teach her a lesson for her own good! After the rape. Uncle Sam: She deserved to be raped.
Hate world. Revenge soon!
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 22 by SoulSlay, posted 12-09-2004 5:46 PM | | SoulSlay has not replied |
|
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 506 days) Posts: 3645 From: Indianapolis, IN Joined: 03-29-2004
|
Re: News Flash... Read news before posting
I'm getting cranky just by reading your posts. You tend not to be specific about anything. Saying "at least one of his advisors..." ain't specific. You made a claim earlier that we have found WMD in Iraq. I've been watching CNN since... forever and I haven't heard such news. Would you mind at least describe what kind of WMD did we find? I often do this to show people that your method of being so vague that noone can seriously debate with you can be used against you. I heard somewhere that you are a dork. I'm not saying that you are one, I'm just saying that I heard somewhere that you are one. I'm going to post a public apology after I have seen some kind of evidence from you. If you are right, which I have no doubt that you have no doubt, then it shouldn't be a problem for you to find some kind of evidence or specific explanation.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 37 by JESUS freak, posted 12-13-2004 1:43 PM | | JESUS freak has not replied |
|
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 506 days) Posts: 3645 From: Indianapolis, IN Joined: 03-29-2004
|
|
|
Message 59 of 80 (168947)
12-16-2004 2:08 PM
|
Reply to: Message 58 by CK
12-16-2004 12:54 PM
|
|
Re: Any real proof?
Hey Charles, you are wasting your time with JF. If you want my professional opinion, he's a know-it-all 14-17 year old who is partially illiterate. This would explain why he continues to ignore all the facts that are all around him.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 58 by CK, posted 12-16-2004 12:54 PM | | CK has not replied |
|
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 506 days) Posts: 3645 From: Indianapolis, IN Joined: 03-29-2004
|
Re: Any real proof?
Hint: It starts with a "t".
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 62 by JESUS freak, posted 12-16-2004 4:16 PM | | JESUS freak has not replied |
|
™ Version 4.2