Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Quantum Interference
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 5 of 31 (168354)
12-15-2004 12:52 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by JustinC
12-08-2004 8:21 AM


more info?
I would need to know some more first.
if you split and mirror as before but now move in two "beam splitters" and 4 detectors to determine if one is always reflected and one is always transmitted if the path lengths are kept the same.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by JustinC, posted 12-08-2004 8:21 AM JustinC has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 9 of 31 (168740)
12-15-2004 9:37 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by Peeper
12-15-2004 11:58 AM


Re: Phase wrong among other things
I'm glad we helped you find that answer ... :whew:
(and you wanted help???)
so what happens when you run my version (where they go through the same individual experiences but do not meet at the centered "beam splitter")?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by Peeper, posted 12-15-2004 11:58 AM Peeper has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by Peeper, posted 12-15-2004 11:08 PM RAZD has replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 11 of 31 (168754)
12-15-2004 11:35 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by Peeper
12-15-2004 11:08 PM


Re: Phase wrong among other things
Don't you think it should be part of the first experiment? a control?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by Peeper, posted 12-15-2004 11:08 PM Peeper has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by Peeper, posted 12-16-2004 12:01 AM RAZD has replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 13 of 31 (168840)
12-16-2004 7:17 AM
Reply to: Message 12 by Peeper
12-16-2004 12:01 AM


Re: Phase wrong among other things
Mine is defferent as it takes out the recombination possibility by cutting the pathe short -- take the original diagram and put the beam splitters at half the distance from the mirrors and move the detectors up accordingly. you end up with four possible end paths and four detectors to test them.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by Peeper, posted 12-16-2004 12:01 AM Peeper has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by Peeper, posted 12-16-2004 10:49 AM RAZD has replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 15 of 31 (169163)
12-16-2004 8:54 PM
Reply to: Message 14 by Peeper
12-16-2004 10:49 AM


Re: Phase wrong among other things
that doesn't give the same control on the experiment. I want to see it they always go to the same side even if they do not have the {combination\interference} possibility.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by Peeper, posted 12-16-2004 10:49 AM Peeper has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by Peeper, posted 12-17-2004 12:07 AM RAZD has replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1435 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 18 of 31 (169210)
12-17-2004 12:30 AM
Reply to: Message 17 by Peeper
12-17-2004 12:07 AM


Re: Phase wrong among other things
but it doesn't test to see that it happens anyway or that something else happens.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by Peeper, posted 12-17-2004 12:07 AM Peeper has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024