January, 2005, Posts of the Month

Message 182Dshortt takes a needed breather and summarizes the state of the discussion. I think he is reasonable (or better than) clear in his position too.I many not agree and think there are serious flaws but it is well done anyway. It will take some time to point out the flaws in detail. I don't think current responses have been up to the standard of this post.This message has been edited by NosyNed, 01-05-2005 13:33 AM

I'm not going to supply a specific post. I've just realized that every time I see Schraf's nic on a post I make a point of reading it first.Only a few stand out but her minimum quality is very high.

Message 153
Genger shows how science including the quantitative approach needed can be used to reduce the uncertainty in an issue. In this case he makes it very clear what is necessary to really discuss this. Arm waving simply does not cut it.Way to go, only 15 posts and a POTM already. I wish my ratio was 1% of that.This message has been edited by NosyNed, 01-21-2005 13:50 AM

Message 55A lot of work to try to help Buz see more clearly. A gentle summary.(perhaps a useful simple example of using evidence too?)I hope it isn't misplaced.

Syamsu manages to top ... well himself. Message 16It may not be the most well reasoned post, the most evidenced or the most erudite of the month. However, it might be the funniest.