Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Christian Group has bank account removed due to "unacceptable views"
bubblelife
Inactive Member


Message 164 of 291 (221633)
07-04-2005 9:22 AM
Reply to: Message 152 by Faith
07-04-2005 7:59 AM


Re: Marriage is for heterosexuals, period.
I'm new to these on line discussion things, but this is how i see things. Marriage is these days about a consensual relationship being aknowleded by the State. People can choose to have no religious input in their marriage service. Surely then you ARE saying that gays are inferior as they are not permitted/entitled to have legal proof of their relationship.
This is the true reason that children are not allowed to marry in this country. They are deemed not to be ready to make such a significant decision. In other countries and in the past children were married off, and it certainly was not for thier protection!
Of course when it comes to a marriage sanctified by a church, then it should be down to each church to decide if the practice fits the views that it holds.
As regards your stance on abstinence education. Yes this i agree is a good thing, but not if it is the sole education given. People should be given the information they need to make an informed decision. This cannot be done if only one option is presented.
And as far as contraception goes: Yes it most certainly should be made available to as many people as can possibly access it. Did you know that in developing countries the current most widely used form of contraception is anal sex. This is the most risky in terms of STD infection, and could be largely eliminated if those people had access to and were educated that it is ok to use condoms. This is one of the most untalked about causes of the huge epidemic of HIV/AIDs.
May i also add, that regarding your comment on the problems of single parents, many single parents i know/ know of had teenage pregnancies, largely preventable by contraception. The rest are from divorces which provees that marriages between heterosexuals are imperfect by far. Gay marriage would have little impact on the amount of single parent families.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 152 by Faith, posted 07-04-2005 7:59 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 172 by Faith, posted 07-04-2005 10:27 AM bubblelife has replied

  
bubblelife
Inactive Member


Message 167 of 291 (221636)
07-04-2005 9:35 AM
Reply to: Message 165 by CK
07-04-2005 9:24 AM


Re: An open call to those who support Abstinence
I would like to be involved in that. i believe that there are many benefits to such a life style, but i also aknowledge that the spirit can be willing, but the flesh is weak!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 165 by CK, posted 07-04-2005 9:24 AM CK has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 168 by PaulK, posted 07-04-2005 9:50 AM bubblelife has not replied
 Message 169 by Modulous, posted 07-04-2005 9:55 AM bubblelife has not replied

  
bubblelife
Inactive Member


Message 176 of 291 (221656)
07-04-2005 11:10 AM
Reply to: Message 172 by Faith
07-04-2005 10:27 AM


Re: Marriage is for heterosexuals, period.
I disagree with your stance that gay marriage will be the ruin of society. How can publicly recognising the validity of a couple's love de-value marriage. What devalues marriage is more the celebrity practice of getting married for a month,6 months, a year, and making this appear normal. Marriage should be re-established as a long term option to be carefully considered.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 172 by Faith, posted 07-04-2005 10:27 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 178 by crashfrog, posted 07-04-2005 12:26 PM bubblelife has not replied
 Message 185 by Faith, posted 07-04-2005 7:18 PM bubblelife has not replied

  
bubblelife
Inactive Member


Message 182 of 291 (221679)
07-04-2005 1:15 PM
Reply to: Message 173 by Faith
07-04-2005 10:33 AM


Re: Why state sanctioned marriage?
I think it is more important that a child have loving parents than the sexuality of said parents.
Heterosexual marriage you have to admit does not frequently equal stable families. This difference was most noticable during a sunday school craft that we did recently. The family tree, with the members of the family. In the craft guide it suggested, get the children to draw their mum, dad and siblings. Not so simple any more!
Stable parenting can be provided by single people or single sex couples if they have a suitable supportive network. Surely we should be focusing more on providing strong supportive networks with people than condemning them to single childless lives because we disagree with the way they express their sexuality.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 173 by Faith, posted 07-04-2005 10:33 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 189 by Faith, posted 07-04-2005 7:28 PM bubblelife has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024