|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Why do you believe what you believe? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
Would you say the same thing if I'd replace 'God' with 'monsters under your bed', or 'pixies'? If you reason like this, then anything, however outrageous, can be said to exist, and it should not be considered irrational. One might say that there is no reason why one should not believe in God--also, no reason why one should. Pixies and other such entities are not on the same level as the creator of the universe. This message has been edited by robinrohan, 07-27-2005 06:38 AM
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
But how do you know the monster under my bed didn't create the universe and is now just having a kip? If the monster under the bed created the universe, then that's just another name for god. I'm not sure what a "kip" is. A night on the town? A moment of mischief?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
The only reason you give why believing in God is not irrational, as opposed to believing in pixies, is that God created the universe. There are only 2 answers as to how the universe exists: 1. It has always existed 2. It was created by something or other. If pixies, then pixies are god. I suppose one might say that the universe created itself, but that doesn't make any sense to me. If it didn't exist, it couldn't create anything. Or one might say that our universe was created by another universe, but that just begs the question. Big Bang theory suggests that the universe came into existence, but of course there is no way to investigate what happened before .000000001 second or whatever the figure is after the expansion began and after space and time--mind you--came into existence in its present form. It's hard to imagine a universe existing with no space-time around, but I suppose anything is possible. Maybe there was this male quark and it combined with the female quark and thus birthed the universe--thus the term "charmed quark." These two quarks had to have been dating for eternity; otherwise, something created them. So there has to be something that is eternal.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
The universe simply exists, even if it hasn't always existed. One fine day it just started existing on its own? That makes no sense to me. Something out of nothing? Ex nihilo?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
Even if everything we observe does have a cause, one cannot simply assume that the unverse has a cause; this is the fallacy of composition -- assuming that the whole has the same properties as its constituent parts. Even if everything within the univese does have a cause, the universe as a whole is unique enough that it does not have to share that same property. All these labels you come up with--the fallacy of this and that--could be applied to the above. What is this fallacy? The fallacy of "it's possible that something that makes no sense could be?" Yeah, I suppose it's possible. It's just another way of saying that the universe in some form always existed. And that business about virtual particles does not apply since we observe them within a universe where there are all sorts of other things around.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
In the same way, saying that a creator created the universe is begging the question also. Who created the creator? If something created the creator, then he, she, or it is not the creator. But if something exists--as it does--then there has to be something that is eternal--either nature or pixies. Something can't create itself.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
That the universe may have existed forever? I don't see the logical impossibility of that. That the universe may have "begun" without a cause? That the universe has existed forever makes sense. That the universe began without a cause makes no sense. But if you want to say "it's possible," fine.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
Only if you think that everything must have a cause. Maybe that's not the case. Maybe not. And maybe there's a god. I don't see any reason for accepting one idea over the other. Therefore, it's just as rational to believe in god as not to believe in god. Such beliefs are not on the same level as believing in pixies, which are merely extraneous entities.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
You can call it what you like--pixies, fairies, the cosmic egg . . .
But if the universe was created, something had to create it. But there's always the possibility that it has existed forever.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
The evidence, such as it is, is that the universe exists, and the speculation is that it used not to (big bang). If that is the case, something had to make it come into existence. That something we label "god." No reason why "god," whatever that is, should "interact."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
The only way it could be extraneous is if the universe existed always. Otherwise, "god" is the cause of everything. You could hardly call that extraneous.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
I know what a logical fallacy is; I was denying I was committing any.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
The purported God did not cause himself. That's impossible. He just always existed.
I also said that one could claim that the universe always existed as an alternative. What I am denying is that something can cause itself to come into existence from non-existence.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
There is a whole lot of wasted time in intercessary prayer then, isn't there? Might be. I don't know. The more attributes you ascribe to God, the less reasonable the idea becomes. If you just stick to Creator, it's not unreasonable.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
Aren't you arguing on another thread that morality derives from God? Not that I recall. I was arguing that human morality has no ground, if that's what you're referring to.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024