Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,924 Year: 4,181/9,624 Month: 1,052/974 Week: 11/368 Day: 11/11 Hour: 0/2


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Is It Science? ⇒

Evolutionary science is fraudulent and/or inaccurate?

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Evolutionary science is fraudulent and/or inaccurate?
MangyTiger
Member (Idle past 6384 days)
Posts: 989
From: Leicester, UK
Joined: 07-30-2004

Normal Thread Display
Message 2 of 27 (231673)
08-09-2005 10:10 PM 		Reply to: Message 1 by nator
08-09-2005 9:40 PM

While we're waiting
Despite you specifying "professional literature" I suspect two of the first three responses will be Piltdown man and Nebraska man. The third will be the 1999 National Geographic story about the Archaeoraptor fossil that eventually turned out to be a fake (albeit made from parts of two previously unknown dinosaurs).
​
Oh and when randman is unsuspended he'll tell you that Pakicetus isn't a cetacean.
​
Oops! Wrong Planet
This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by nator, posted 08-09-2005 9:40 PM nator has not replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by CK, posted 08-10-2005 7:39 AM MangyTiger has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024