Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Where to publish critiques of creationist issues?
mick
Member (Idle past 5016 days)
Posts: 913
Joined: 02-17-2005


Message 3 of 5 (234522)
08-18-2005 1:47 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by aharvey
08-18-2005 11:11 AM


hi aharvey,
Some of the philosophy journals will deal with this stuff. Here's a recent example from Biology and Philosophy:
quote:
The argument from biogenesis: Probabilities against a natural origin of life
R. C. Carrier(1)
(1) Columbia University, USA
Abstract No evidence exists that the accidental origin of life is too improbable to have occurred naturally, but there are numerous attempts to argue so. Dizzying statistics are cited to show that a god had to be responsible. This paper identifies the Argument from Biogenesis, then explains why all these arguments so far fail, and what would actually have to be done to make such an argument succeed. Describes seven general types of error, with examples. Includes a table of forty-seven statistics used by over twenty authors to date.
Reference link

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by aharvey, posted 08-18-2005 11:11 AM aharvey has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024