Thanks for that information Quetzal.
That leads me to ask when is something considered in the realm of Chemistry or Biology? Is abiogenisis chemistry or biology?
For Ten-sai:
If the basis of Evolution involves several different disciplines, then it would seem that the YEC/ID crowd should be required to present new theories for them as well? A blanket statement damning biological theories is not enough to displace Evolution now so how could they redefine chemistry, physics, and others with nothing more than "it does not work"?
Also, it is one thing to attack a position, a completely differnt animal presenting your own position. What theories are there on Creationism?
One last thing for now, if Evolution is wrong, would that automatically make Creationism right? If so, whose version of creation? Or, could there be another possibility that is neither creation nor evolution?
------------------
When all else fails, check the manual