Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,912 Year: 4,169/9,624 Month: 1,040/974 Week: 367/286 Day: 10/13 Hour: 0/1


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Biological Evolution ⇒

Instinct - evolved or better answer?

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Instinct - evolved or better answer?
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1497 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003

Normal Thread Display
Message 31 of 73 (266211)
12-06-2005 9:14 PM 		Reply to: Message 27 by Carico
12-06-2005 6:19 PM

It is simply impossible for one species to produce offspring of a different species with whom it cannot breed.
​
Well, we observe speciation, and the commensurate loss of interfertility, all the time. It's very common.
​
This is an elementary principle of biology that evolutionists either do not understand or blatantly lie about.
​
Well, since we make observations of what you say is impossible, it's you who is either mistaken or lying. Which is it, I wonder? You wouldn't be the first so-called Christian to show up here and lie for Jesus.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by Carico, posted 12-06-2005 6:19 PM Carico has not replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 32 by AdminNWR, posted 12-06-2005 9:21 PM crashfrog has replied
  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1497 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003

Normal Thread Display
Message 33 of 73 (266214)
12-06-2005 9:22 PM 		Reply to: Message 32 by AdminNWR
12-06-2005 9:21 PM

Re: Please follow the forum rules.
Well, I'll trust that you'll hold her to the same standard. Or do attacks against "evolutionists" simply not constitute personal attacks, while attacks against "Christians" do?
This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by AdminNWR, posted 12-06-2005 9:21 PM AdminNWR has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 34 by AdminNWR, posted 12-06-2005 9:33 PM crashfrog has replied
  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1497 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003

Normal Thread Display
Message 35 of 73 (266221)
12-06-2005 9:36 PM 		Reply to: Message 34 by AdminNWR
12-06-2005 9:33 PM

Re: Please follow the forum rules.
It's cool. I'll keep the snark to a minimum, then.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 34 by AdminNWR, posted 12-06-2005 9:33 PM AdminNWR has not replied
  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1497 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003

Normal Thread Display
Message 41 of 73 (401442)
05-19-2007 11:56 PM 		Reply to: Message 40 by MartinV
05-19-2007 2:10 PM

Re: Darwinists have no answer?
Is it possible that darwinists are unable to address problem of evolution of instincts?
​
I don't think anyone has any idea what you're talking about - and I doubt few people are interested in debating with you, when you have all these convinient language barriers that emerge the instant someone has a legitimate rebuttal to your arguments.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 40 by MartinV, posted 05-19-2007 2:10 PM MartinV has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 42 by MartinV, posted 05-20-2007 4:18 AM crashfrog has replied
  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1497 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003

Normal Thread Display
Message 48 of 73 (401507)
05-20-2007 12:29 PM 		Reply to: Message 42 by MartinV
05-20-2007 4:18 AM

Re: Darwinists have no answer?
You don't know.
​
What you're talking about? No, I don't.
​
Anyway that innate behaviour arose via random mutation of DNA is an idea that probably even hard-core darwinists are perplexed by.
​
They arose by random mutation and natural selection.
​
I don't see what's so perplexing about it. You're asserting that "Darwinists" are so perplexed that they see nothing wrong with the explanation. How does that make any sense?
This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by MartinV, posted 05-20-2007 4:18 AM MartinV has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 50 by MartinV, posted 05-20-2007 1:09 PM crashfrog has replied
  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1497 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003

Normal Thread Display
Message 52 of 73 (401611)
05-20-2007 10:39 PM 		Reply to: Message 50 by MartinV
05-20-2007 1:09 PM

Re: Darwinists have no answer?
It sounds like you've answered the question, then:
​
So random mutation is responsible for creating ideas what mushrooms are edible to mammals and what plants have healing effects on worms.
​
Sure. What's so perplexing about that?
This message is a reply to:
 Message 50 by MartinV, posted 05-20-2007 1:09 PM MartinV has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024