It is beginning to appear that Richardson may have been wrong or overstating the case.
There doesn't seem to have been much made available to support what he says. I took it at face value at first but there doesn't seem to be much to support it.
ABE
It seems to me that the "significant influence" is clearly wrong. I'd have to see that spelled out.
This message has been edited by NosyNed, 12-12-2005 10:18 PM