quote:
Originally posted by schrafinator:
Um, NS is an EXPLANATION of a MECHANISM of evolution. They are pretty much linked together, by definition.
Syamsu,
I am guessing that this is what you requested I 'clear up'. Problem is that they are linked together in just the way Schraf says. NS is a mechanism of evolution. I don't think I have said anything different. Our debate in the other thread is about NS in the absense of variation. Technically, if there is no variation there would be no evolution and so in that sense NS does not require the rest of the ToE, but what Schraf said is the other way around. The ToE does require NS.
------------------
No webpage found at provided URL: www.hells-handmaiden.com