Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Limits of Science
Codegate
Member (Idle past 847 days)
Posts: 84
From: The Great White North
Joined: 03-15-2006


Message 43 of 81 (303854)
04-13-2006 10:16 AM
Reply to: Message 37 by simple
04-13-2006 4:16 AM


Re: Common Misconception
I would really like to hear an expaination from your point of view refuting the claims from RAZD's dating thread (Age Correlations and an Old Earth: Version 1 No 3 (formerly Part III)). The information that he presented was very compelling. The fact that there are numerous methods using completely different methodologies for dating the Earth back many many thousands (millions) of years while all agreeing with each other is facinating. I'm having a difficult time coming to grips with how this could all be coincidence, which is what I believe you are saying. This implies to me that if we do live on a young Earth, God must have created it with the intent that we believe it was more then 6000 years old. Why would he/she do that to us?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by simple, posted 04-13-2006 4:16 AM simple has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 48 by simple, posted 04-13-2006 4:13 PM Codegate has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024