I am calling foul.
Similarly, other marsupial animals (monkeys, squirels bears...etc) behave in strikigly similar manner to that of the placental counterparts despite some physiological differences.
There is no such thing as a marsupial monkey, squirl, or bear and I challange you to show that there is. A Koala "Bear" is not a real bear even though we call it that because it is a generic term.
You are also totally wrong about the tasmanian wolf. It is similar to other wolves only in the same way that all other carnivors are similar to wolves. There are more similarities between tigers and wolves then there are between wolves and the tasmanian wolf.
Using your same argument, dolphins and sharks are more similar because they both swim in the ocean and eat other fish. I mean common there are only very minor differences such as how they breed, breathe, and swim.
Tasmanian wolves breed and raise their children fundamentally differently then any placental wolf. This is a HUGE difference. There are also MAJOR anatomical differences between the skull structure of the tasmanian wolf and other wolves. The people who claim similarity are doing so on the basis of 'pointy nose', 'sharp teeth', 'eats meat'. If you need to reduce taxonomy to a game of "Which one is not like the other" then please take your argument out of science and into Sesame Street where it belongs.
Of course, biblical creationists are committed to belief in God's written Word, the Bible, which forbids bearing false witness; --AIG (lest they forget)
™ Version 4.2
