Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The next Einstein
mansouryar
Inactive Member


Message 5 of 26 (339537)
08-12-2006 12:38 PM


TOOOOOOO HOTTTTTTTT
Hi everybody,
The next Einstein is alive and is just a kid and is Iranian and ... is me! Maybe it's not cool to address the members of one forum to another, but I assume you're enough open-minded and invite you to visit this 3-pages discussion;
http://www.greenenergyinvestors.com/index.php?showtopic=2...
Farewell
P.S.: Maybe we could launch a similar dicussion, OK?

Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by CK, posted 08-12-2006 1:15 PM mansouryar has replied

  
mansouryar
Inactive Member


Message 7 of 26 (339592)
08-12-2006 5:17 PM
Reply to: Message 6 by CK
08-12-2006 1:15 PM


Re: TOOOOOOO HOTTTTTTTT
Hi CK,
Thanks for your words. Hmmm, let me see, if you've read my paper you'd know my plan is so huge and complicated that anti-gravity is just a part of it (to reduce tidal forces on the passing spacecraft and humanoid passengers). By the way, I'm a cool guy and I could work with all trends (maybe if you'd give me the (possible) website of those your partners, I could become a friend of them!); maybe the results of that team could be useful for the bigger idea of a practical spacewarp and that can't be problematic if you really could support the finance of the project.
Besides, anti-gravity machines could give you an incredible ability to travel on the ground and air but I don't think you could go by them very far from the earth, but spacewarps could cause interstellar and intergalactic travels ...
How about that one, man?
However, that's your money and you should decide how to spend it.
Anyway, I enjoyed of you message.
Cheers,
Mammad

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by CK, posted 08-12-2006 1:15 PM CK has not replied

  
mansouryar
Inactive Member


Message 13 of 26 (340380)
08-15-2006 7:35 PM


How about this one?
schrafinator,
Why Einstein? Don't you think the term "next Mary Curie" is better?

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by Omnivorous, posted 08-15-2006 8:41 PM mansouryar has not replied
 Message 15 by CK, posted 08-16-2006 6:43 AM mansouryar has replied
 Message 16 by Dr Adequate, posted 08-16-2006 7:22 AM mansouryar has replied

  
mansouryar
Inactive Member


Message 17 of 26 (340462)
08-16-2006 10:07 AM
Reply to: Message 15 by CK
08-16-2006 6:43 AM


Re: How about this one?
I had no special meaning on that comparison. I cited her name, because she won 2 Nobel prizes, and her husband and her child did too (1 prize, of course). Therefore, her position is quite unique in the history of science and that would be a great honor for any lady to be compared with her.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by CK, posted 08-16-2006 6:43 AM CK has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by nator, posted 08-16-2006 12:23 PM mansouryar has not replied

  
mansouryar
Inactive Member


Message 18 of 26 (340466)
08-16-2006 10:24 AM
Reply to: Message 16 by Dr Adequate
08-16-2006 7:22 AM


Dr Adequate,
Yes, you're quite right. Emmy Noether did an enormous service to the science. With more listing of such people, maybe more women would be motivated to show their capabilities.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by Dr Adequate, posted 08-16-2006 7:22 AM Dr Adequate has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by nator, posted 08-16-2006 12:33 PM mansouryar has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024