crash writes:
I'm sorry, a what? A quick Google search turns up only one hit for "tu quoi fallacy" - you, using it in a gay marriage thread on this website.
Hey, french isn't my first language
or is that latin?
But I have never illegally propositioned a minor for sex. So how could I possibly be using tu quoque? I have nothing to defend.
The fallacy also is committed when you accuse the other side of being a hypocrit, which has nothing to do with the issue itself.
No, the reason is because he was a powerful politician who drafted and passed legislation that clearly, he didn't believe he was obligated to obey. He believed he was above the laws he drafted for the rest of us. He did exactly what should be illegal, and is - using power, position, and age to coerece sexual activity from minors.
Again, pointing out hypocrisy does nothing to strengthen your case. The question is has he done anything illegal?
I believe that's an immediate disqualification for leadership. Apparently you don't agree?
So, you admit to having a
moral objection to his hypocrisy and because of this moral objection you think he should not be a leader?
Oh, sure. That hussy was asking for it, dressed as (s)he was.
I'm not saying that at all. He certainly didn't tie the kid down and butt rape him. At anytime if the kid felt uncomfortable he could have blocked any further im.
This is at worse a 52 year old man embarrassing himself in front of a few 16 year olds.