Lets start suggesting questions for the test. Here's my start.
Okay. I'll take the test as it is now given, to see how it goes.
Are an individual's physical traits determined by their DNA?
No.
Are physical traits passed from one generation to the next via DNA?
No.
Do mutations occur?
Yes.
Can a mutation result in a new physical trait?
I'll pass on that question.
Do physical traits help determine whether an individual will survive and reproduce?
"Help determine" is a poor choice of words. In ordinary usage, "help" implies something about intentions.
I'll tentatively answer: No.
If a physical trait is beneficial to survival and reproduction, will that trait become more common in successive generations?
I'll pass on that one, too.
If a physical trait is detrimental to survival and reproduction, will that trait become less common in successive generations?
Yet another pass.
Will different traits be beneficial in different environments?
Yes. And that's why the two preceding questions are bad, and why I gave them a pass.
The questions are too simplistic. The DNA determines proteins, not traits. You have ignored the complex interactions with the environment, and that many traits depend on multiple genes.
Okay, so I am being picky. But there is a reason. Many creationists have learned a strawman version of evolution. The strawman version would probably be enough for them to come up with what you intended to take as the correct answers. To be useful, a test has to distinguish between a decent understanding of evolution and the strawman version.
Compassionate conservatism - bringing you a kinder, gentler torture chamber
™ Version 4.2