It is classic equivocation by evolutionists to mean macroevolution when they speak of evolution, but turn to microevolution when asked for evidence.
Since you haven`t given us a workable definition (or anybodyelse in these fora, that I`m aware of, for that matter) of macro-evolution, micro-evolution, or what`s the difference between them, I`m forced to chalenge your call of equivocation as invalid.
As far as I can see, the macro/micro-evolution is just a meaningless catchy phrase invented (or missrepresented) by creationists in order to distract people`s attention away from the fact that they do not have a single real argumment against the theory of evolution per si except for a feeling of uneasines which by itself amounts to nothing more then personal prejudice against that theory and, by extention, to science in general.