Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,927 Year: 4,184/9,624 Month: 1,055/974 Week: 14/368 Day: 14/11 Hour: 2/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Rep. Virgil Goode, R-Va. says a Muslum should not use Qur'an during swearing in
jar
Member (Idle past 425 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 1 of 32 (371475)
12-21-2006 6:51 PM


Rep. Virgil Goode, R-Va. sent a letter to one of his constituents criticizing the plan of Rep.-elect Keith Ellison, D-Minn., the first Muslim elected to the U.S. Congress, to use a Koran for the ceremonial swearing-in of members next year.
He said: "I do not subscribe to using the Koran in any way."
Representative Ellison is Islamic and so wants to use the Quar'an instead of a Bible during his swearing in ceremony.
source
So should we force Muslims to use the Bible instead or the Qur'an, a Jew to use the Bible instead of the Torah (although I imagine a Jew would prefer nothing)?

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by Chiroptera, posted 12-21-2006 8:37 PM jar has not replied
 Message 4 by Vacate, posted 12-21-2006 8:41 PM jar has not replied
 Message 5 by Omnivorous, posted 12-21-2006 8:58 PM jar has replied
 Message 10 by DorfMan, posted 12-22-2006 11:25 PM jar has replied
 Message 20 by Hyroglyphx, posted 12-24-2006 9:12 PM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 425 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 7 of 32 (371631)
12-22-2006 12:15 PM


Goode afirms and expands his position.
Yesterday, Rep. Virgil H. Goode Jr., a Virginia Republican afirmed his position and expanded it to specifically say that we should revise our immigration laws to limit people of a specific religious belief from coming to the US.
"I do not apologize and I do not retract my letter," Goode said emphatically during a session yesterday with reporters in the southern Virginia town of Rocky Mount. Questioned later on Fox News Channel's Your World, he said, "I am for restricting immigration so that we don't have a majority of Muslims elected to the House of Representatives."
source
Is there some valid reason for excluding people of a specific religious belief from immigrating to the US or holding public office?
If so, would it not be equally valid to say that Christians should not hold office?
Edited by jar, : forgot to link to the source.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by fallacycop, posted 12-22-2006 10:15 PM jar has not replied
 Message 11 by DorfMan, posted 12-22-2006 11:30 PM jar has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 425 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 8 of 32 (371646)
12-22-2006 12:56 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by Omnivorous
12-21-2006 8:58 PM


On the Constitution.
I'd rather see them all swear on the Constitution. I'd rather that meant more to their service in office than their denomination of myth.
Actually in the official swearing in ceremony they swear to uphold the Constitution and the Laws of the land.
He will do the same in the private ceremony but with the addition of placing his left hand on something he considers sacred for emphasis.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Omnivorous, posted 12-21-2006 8:58 PM Omnivorous has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 425 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 12 of 32 (371768)
12-22-2006 11:40 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by DorfMan
12-22-2006 11:25 PM


Re: Let him not swear on
Let him not swear on ...
any book, but let him swear he will uphold the constitution of the United States and let him prove he understands what that is. Let him swear that he is an American before he is a muslim, the latter being the most critical part. I support Goode and will let him know so in a letter.
Actually, during the official ceremony as Goode well knows, all of the members swear with their right hand raised that they will support the Constitution and uphold the Laws of the land. Goode, having been through the ceremony himself know that and so his objection is simply nonsense from the very beginning. It is another example of "Lying for Christ."
And if you wish to support Goode, fine, but plese understand that he knows well he is misrepresenting the truth when he fails to point out the FACTS of the official Swearing In Ceremony.
Why should Ellison have to swear he is an American before he is a Muslim any more than a Jew or a Christian or a Roman Catholic? You do know also that bringing up immigration as an issue is another example of Goode's dishonesty. Rep. Ellison's family has been in the US and US citizens since the 1700 so immigration is just another example of misdirection and misrepresentation.
To swear on the Bible is just as incorrect, etc. When a man serves caesar, he ought to serve him well. It is important for Christians to be exemplary citizens.
If, during the unofficial private ceremony someone wishes to us a symbol to accentuate the seriousness of the oath they are taking, how can it be other than complimentary? During the private ceremony they still raise their right hand and swear to uphold the Constitution and the Laws of the Land.
Is it possible that Goode really is as ignorant of the facts as it seems or is it that he simply thinks his constituents are really that ignorant and that it is really that easy to hide the pea while he switches the shells and cons them?

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by DorfMan, posted 12-22-2006 11:25 PM DorfMan has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by nator, posted 12-23-2006 6:18 PM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 425 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 14 of 32 (371878)
12-23-2006 7:01 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by nator
12-23-2006 6:18 PM


Re: Let him not swear on
My personal belief is that the bigot vote is too important of a constituancy to the Republican party for them to risk alienating them.
I'm not sure bigot is actually the right term. I think it is more a matter of fear and that so many Republicans realize that they probably could not compete against people that grew up is a less sheltered environment. The Republican Party today is trying to attract the weak, ignorant and fearful.
What is interesting though is that Rep. Goode is using exactly the same tactics that the ID and Biblical Creationists use, misdirection and misrepresentation. He misdirects the audience's attention by not explaining the difference between the general official ceremony and the private unofficial ceremony as though the Qur'an was part of the official ceremony, then when their attention is diverted, he palms the pea and moves on to immigration even though immigration is TOTALLY unrelated to the issue and COMPLETELY unrelated to Rep. Ellison.
Rep Goode is simply being dishonest, but as we have seen, he will likely get away with it. The fact is that his audience is simply not bright enough to see that he is pulling the old Carny trick and conning them.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by nator, posted 12-23-2006 6:18 PM nator has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 15 by Monk, posted 12-23-2006 8:06 PM jar has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 425 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 16 of 32 (371889)
12-23-2006 8:16 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by Monk
12-23-2006 8:06 PM


Re: Let him not swear on
Goode is using the occasion of a Muslim being elected to a position in our government to push for legislative changes. The fact, that Rep. Ellison has nothing to do with immigration, is irrelevant for Goode's purposes. He is making the connection. He is doing it to arouse fear. Once aroused, fear can be used to push for changes in immigration policy regarding muslims.
Thank you.
I personally think that is exactly what the Republican Party relies on these days, FUD, Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt. That and the ignorance of the party base that doesn't see him palming the pea.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by Monk, posted 12-23-2006 8:06 PM Monk has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by nator, posted 12-23-2006 9:42 PM jar has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 425 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 23 of 32 (372098)
12-24-2006 10:49 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by Hyroglyphx
12-24-2006 9:12 PM


Goode has violated the oath of office and should be impeached.
If Goode wants to argue his point, let him.
No one prevented Goode from speaking his piece or even elaborating on it.
What is happening is that others are simply pointing out Goode's dishonesty.
What this is about is that Goode simply commits a sin of omission by only telling a half truth. He says that Ellison will be sworn in using a Qur'an. He neglects to say that is only during the unofficial private ceremony and that during the official ceremony, Ellison, just like Goode and every other Representative, will be sworn in simply by raising their right hand.
He then commits a sin of commission by bring in immigration. Since Rep Ellison's family have been US citizens since at least the 1700's, immigration is not an issue and is unrelated to anything involving Rep. Ellison.
He goes a step further and says that he will not uphold the very Constitution he swears to uphold.
That should be grounds for impeachment. There is no doubt that Rep. Goode has shown he will not uphold the Constitution of the United States and that he should NOT be allowed to take office.
As pointed out back in Message 18 by subbie, Article VI of the Constitution says that "no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States." When Rep. Goode said
"The Muslim Representative from Minnesota was elected by the voters of that district and if American citizens don't wake up and adopt the Virgil Goode position on immigration there will likely be many more Muslims elected to office and demanding the use of the Koran."
and later expanded to say ...
"I am for restricting immigration so that we don't have a majority of Muslims elected to the House of Representatives."
he is advocating a religious test for holding office.
Rep. Goode should be barred from taking office. By his very words he has shown that he will not uphold his oath of office and so is not worthy of the position.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by Hyroglyphx, posted 12-24-2006 9:12 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 26 by subbie, posted 12-25-2006 6:32 PM jar has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 425 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 30 of 32 (374537)
01-04-2007 5:58 PM
Reply to: Message 29 by subbie
01-04-2007 5:51 PM


Re: Brilliant! Simply brilliant. And priceless!
Yeah. We were talking about that in chat earlier.
I was surprised that folk did not know that TJ had a copy of the Qu'ran.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by subbie, posted 01-04-2007 5:51 PM subbie has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 31 by subbie, posted 01-04-2007 6:09 PM jar has not replied
 Message 32 by Omnivorous, posted 01-04-2007 6:23 PM jar has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024