Dr. Kent Hovind offers $250,000 to anyone who can show him real scientific proof of macro-evolution.
More accurately, he
doesn't offer $250,000 to anyone who can prove macro-evolution, for two reasons: 1) Macroevolution is a meaningless term (there's no difference between micro- and macroevolution) and 2)
by his own admission he doesn't have the money.
So, since he's basically a liar (as well as potentially being in trouble with the law) why would you believe anything he has to say on the topic? I dare you to present any of Hovind's "damning arguments" against evolution. I for one never get tired of refuting them - because it's so easy!