Evolution

More accurately, he doesn't offer $250,000 to anyone who can prove macro-evolution, for two reasons: 1) Macroevolution is a meaningless term (there's no difference between micro- and macroevolution) and 2) by his own admission he doesn't have the money.So, since he's basically a liar (as well as potentially being in trouble with the law) why would you believe anything he has to say on the topic? I dare you to present any of Hovind's "damning arguments" against evolution. I for one never get tired of refuting them - because it's so easy!

Maybe he was there, if he exists. Too bad he never wrote down what really happened himself. I guess we'll just have to make inferences from the evidence. Oh, well. And I imagine creationists will insist that god wrote the bible, even though he'll say he didn't!